From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <RuthC@Radware.com>
Received: from mailout1.radware.com (mailout1.radwarecloud.com
 [192.115.180.130]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570CF7CAB
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:55:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ILMB2.corp.radware.com ([169.254.2.72]) by
 ILCAS2.corp.radware.com ([176.200.120.122]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed,
 21 Jun 2017 18:55:35 +0300
From: Ruth Christen <RuthC@Radware.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: fm10k issue with frames bigger than 1536
Thread-Index: AdLqpdncpCKdykmVScKQtHh2MCzpOw==
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:55:34 +0000
Message-ID: <3C2AE3A004FB424A9D4DB093543E06A9010A4B4E0E@ILMB2.corp.radware.com>
Accept-Language: he-IL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [176.200.121.204]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4179-8.100.1062-23146.007
x-tm-as-result: No--16.712200-0.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] fm10k issue with frames bigger than 1536
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:55:36 -0000

Hi,
I'm working with fm10k 100G card, fm10k driver is 0.21.7, testpoint using S=
DK version- 4.3.2.
I have 2 vms, each one attached to 1 VF- binded with dpdk.
One of the VFs receives a frame of size 1514, it encapsulates it with vxlan=
 and sends the new frame (size 1584) to the 2nd VF.
The result is the frame received in the second VF is cut to a size of 1536.=
 (supposed to be 1584- as it is sent)
I've noticed this patch: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4954/ which is=
 included in my code, but I couldn't solve the problem.
I've tried enabling jumbo frame (although buffer size (1704) is enough to h=
old 1584 bytes) and increasing the max_rx_pkt_len.
Any advice?
Thanks!