From: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
To: ?????? ???????? <imustafin@bk.ru>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META doesn't work properly
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:26:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891263231B304@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424449505.129655495@f327.i.mail.ru>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of ?????? ????????
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 4:25 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META doesn't work
> properly
>
> Hi, list!
>
> RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META option in rte_pipeline library doesn't
> work for non-default table entries. Is this bug or correct behaviour?
>
> This is my patch, that changes this behaviour:
>
> --- a/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_pipeline.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pipeline/rte_pipeline.c
> @@ -999,8 +999,10 @@ rte_pipeline_compute_masks(struct rte_pipeline
> *p, uint64_t pkts_mask)
> {
> p->action_mask1[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_DROP] = 0;
> p->action_mask1[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT] = 0;
> + p->action_mask1[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META] = 0;
> p->action_mask1[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_TABLE] = 0;
>
> +
> if ((pkts_mask & (pkts_mask + 1)) == 0) {
> uint64_t n_pkts = __builtin_popcountll(pkts_mask);
> uint32_t i;
> @@ -1224,6 +1226,7 @@ rte_pipeline_run(struct rte_pipeline *p)
> pkts_mask = RTE_LEN2MASK(n_pkts, uint64_t);
> p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_DROP] = 0;
> p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT] = 0;
> + p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META] = 0;
> p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_TABLE] = 0;
>
> /* Input port user actions */
> @@ -1300,6 +1303,9 @@ rte_pipeline_run(struct rte_pipeline *p)
> p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT] |=
> p->action_mask1[
> RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT];
> + p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META] |=
> + p->action_mask1[
> + RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_PORT_META];
> p->action_mask0[RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_TABLE] |=
> p->action_mask1[
> RTE_PIPELINE_ACTION_TABLE];
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks, Ildar
Acked by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Thank you, Ildar!
--------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Shannon Limited
Registered in Ireland
Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare
Registered Number: 308263
Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-20 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-20 16:25 Ильдар Мустафин
2015-02-20 19:26 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian [this message]
2015-02-20 20:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-02-20 20:55 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891263231B304@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=imustafin@bk.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).