DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] eal: use correct data type for slab operations
       [not found] <1537803523-23347-1-git-send-email-vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>
@ 2018-09-24 15:50 ` Vivek Sharma
  2018-09-24 17:12   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
  2018-09-25  9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: use correct data type for bitmap " Vivek Sharma
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vivek Sharma @ 2018-09-24 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cristian.dumitrescu; +Cc: Sharma, Vivek, stable, dev

+ dev.
+cristian(Bitmap maintainer)

Please review.

Thanks!

On Monday 24 September 2018 09:08 PM, Vivek Sharma wrote:
> Currently, slab operations use unsigned long data type for 64-bit slab
> related operations. On target 'i686-native-linuxapp-gcc', unsigned long
> is 32-bit and thus, slab operations breaks on this target. Changing slab
> operations to use unsigned long long for correct functioning on all targets.
> 
> Fixes: de3cfa2c9823 ("sched: initial import")
> Fixes: 693f715da45c ("remove extra parentheses in return statement")
> CC: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Sharma <vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h | 14 +++++++-------
>  test/test/test_bitmap.c                    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
> index d9facc6..7a36ce7 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ __rte_bitmap_index1_inc(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
>  static inline uint64_t
>  __rte_bitmap_mask1_get(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
>  {
> -	return (~1lu) << bmp->offset1;
> +	return (~1llu) << bmp->offset1;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void
> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ rte_bitmap_get(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos)
>  	index2 = pos >> RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE_LOG2;
>  	offset2 = pos & RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_MASK;
>  	slab2 = bmp->array2 + index2;
> -	return (*slab2) & (1lu << offset2);
> +	return (*slab2) & (1llu << offset2);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -342,8 +342,8 @@ rte_bitmap_set(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos)
>  	slab2 = bmp->array2 + index2;
>  	slab1 = bmp->array1 + index1;
>  
> -	*slab2 |= 1lu << offset2;
> -	*slab1 |= 1lu << offset1;
> +	*slab2 |= 1llu << offset2;
> +	*slab1 |= 1llu << offset1;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ rte_bitmap_set_slab(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos, uint64_t slab)
>  	slab1 = bmp->array1 + index1;
>  
>  	*slab2 |= slab;
> -	*slab1 |= 1lu << offset1;
> +	*slab1 |= 1llu << offset1;
>  }
>  
>  static inline uint64_t
> @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ rte_bitmap_clear(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos)
>  	slab2 = bmp->array2 + index2;
>  
>  	/* Return if array2 slab is not all-zeros */
> -	*slab2 &= ~(1lu << offset2);
> +	*slab2 &= ~(1llu << offset2);
>  	if (*slab2){
>  		return;
>  	}
> @@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ rte_bitmap_clear(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos)
>  	index1 = pos >> (RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE_LOG2 + RTE_BITMAP_CL_BIT_SIZE_LOG2);
>  	offset1 = (pos >> RTE_BITMAP_CL_BIT_SIZE_LOG2) & RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_MASK;
>  	slab1 = bmp->array1 + index1;
> -	*slab1 &= ~(1lu << offset1);
> +	*slab1 &= ~(1llu << offset1);
>  
>  	return;
>  }
> diff --git a/test/test/test_bitmap.c b/test/test/test_bitmap.c
> index c3169e9..95c5184 100644
> --- a/test/test/test_bitmap.c
> +++ b/test/test/test_bitmap.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ test_bitmap_slab_set_get(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
>  static int
>  test_bitmap_set_get_clear(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
>  {
> +	uint64_t val;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	rte_bitmap_reset(bmp);
> @@ -124,6 +125,23 @@ test_bitmap_set_get_clear(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	rte_bitmap_reset(bmp);
> +
> +	/* Alternate slab set test */
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS; i++) {
> +		if (i % RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE)
> +			rte_bitmap_set(bmp, i);
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS; i++) {
> +		val = rte_bitmap_get(bmp, i);
> +		if (((i % RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE) && !val) ||
> +		    (!(i % RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE) && val)) {
> +			printf("Failed to get set bit.\n");
> +			return TEST_FAILED;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	return TEST_SUCCESS;
>  }
>  
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] eal: use correct data type for slab operations
  2018-09-24 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] eal: use correct data type for slab operations Vivek Sharma
@ 2018-09-24 17:12   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
  2018-10-08 15:57     ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dumitrescu, Cristian @ 2018-09-24 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vivek Sharma; +Cc: Sharma, Vivek, stable, dev



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vivek Sharma [mailto:vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 4:50 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> Cc: Sharma, Vivek <Vivek.Sharma@cavium.com>; stable@dpdk.org;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] eal: use correct data type for slab operations
> 
> + dev.
> +cristian(Bitmap maintainer)
> 
> Please review.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> On Monday 24 September 2018 09:08 PM, Vivek Sharma wrote:
> > Currently, slab operations use unsigned long data type for 64-bit slab
> > related operations. On target 'i686-native-linuxapp-gcc', unsigned long
> > is 32-bit and thus, slab operations breaks on this target. Changing slab
> > operations to use unsigned long long for correct functioning on all targets.
> >
> > Fixes: de3cfa2c9823 ("sched: initial import")
> > Fixes: 693f715da45c ("remove extra parentheses in return statement")
> > CC: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Sharma <vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h | 14 +++++++-------
> >  test/test/test_bitmap.c                    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >

Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: use correct data type for bitmap slab operations
       [not found] <1537803523-23347-1-git-send-email-vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>
  2018-09-24 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] eal: use correct data type for slab operations Vivek Sharma
@ 2018-09-25  9:53 ` Vivek Sharma
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vivek Sharma @ 2018-09-25  9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev; +Cc: stable, cristian.dumitrescu, Sharma, Vivek

Currently, slab operations use unsigned long data type for 64-bit slab
related operations. On target 'i686-native-linuxapp-gcc', unsigned long
is 32-bit and thus, slab operations breaks on this target. Changing slab
operations to use unsigned long long for correct functioning on
all targets.

Fixes: de3cfa2c9823 ("sched: initial import")
Fixes: 693f715da45c ("remove extra parentheses in return statement")
CC: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Vivek Sharma <vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>
Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
---
v1-->v2:
* Added Acked-by:
* check-git-log.sh fixes.

 lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h | 14 +++++++-------
 test/test/test_bitmap.c                    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
index d9facc6..7a36ce7 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ __rte_bitmap_index1_inc(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
 static inline uint64_t
 __rte_bitmap_mask1_get(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
 {
-	return (~1lu) << bmp->offset1;
+	return (~1llu) << bmp->offset1;
 }
 
 static inline void
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ rte_bitmap_get(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos)
 	index2 = pos >> RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE_LOG2;
 	offset2 = pos & RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_MASK;
 	slab2 = bmp->array2 + index2;
-	return (*slab2) & (1lu << offset2);
+	return (*slab2) & (1llu << offset2);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -342,8 +342,8 @@ rte_bitmap_set(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos)
 	slab2 = bmp->array2 + index2;
 	slab1 = bmp->array1 + index1;
 
-	*slab2 |= 1lu << offset2;
-	*slab1 |= 1lu << offset1;
+	*slab2 |= 1llu << offset2;
+	*slab1 |= 1llu << offset1;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ rte_bitmap_set_slab(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos, uint64_t slab)
 	slab1 = bmp->array1 + index1;
 
 	*slab2 |= slab;
-	*slab1 |= 1lu << offset1;
+	*slab1 |= 1llu << offset1;
 }
 
 static inline uint64_t
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ rte_bitmap_clear(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos)
 	slab2 = bmp->array2 + index2;
 
 	/* Return if array2 slab is not all-zeros */
-	*slab2 &= ~(1lu << offset2);
+	*slab2 &= ~(1llu << offset2);
 	if (*slab2){
 		return;
 	}
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ rte_bitmap_clear(struct rte_bitmap *bmp, uint32_t pos)
 	index1 = pos >> (RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE_LOG2 + RTE_BITMAP_CL_BIT_SIZE_LOG2);
 	offset1 = (pos >> RTE_BITMAP_CL_BIT_SIZE_LOG2) & RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_MASK;
 	slab1 = bmp->array1 + index1;
-	*slab1 &= ~(1lu << offset1);
+	*slab1 &= ~(1llu << offset1);
 
 	return;
 }
diff --git a/test/test/test_bitmap.c b/test/test/test_bitmap.c
index c3169e9..95c5184 100644
--- a/test/test/test_bitmap.c
+++ b/test/test/test_bitmap.c
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ test_bitmap_slab_set_get(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
 static int
 test_bitmap_set_get_clear(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
 {
+	uint64_t val;
 	int i;
 
 	rte_bitmap_reset(bmp);
@@ -124,6 +125,23 @@ test_bitmap_set_get_clear(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
 		}
 	}
 
+	rte_bitmap_reset(bmp);
+
+	/* Alternate slab set test */
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS; i++) {
+		if (i % RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE)
+			rte_bitmap_set(bmp, i);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BITS; i++) {
+		val = rte_bitmap_get(bmp, i);
+		if (((i % RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE) && !val) ||
+		    (!(i % RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE) && val)) {
+			printf("Failed to get set bit.\n");
+			return TEST_FAILED;
+		}
+	}
+
 	return TEST_SUCCESS;
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] eal: use correct data type for slab operations
  2018-09-24 17:12   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
@ 2018-10-08 15:57     ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dumitrescu, Cristian @ 2018-10-08 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Vivek Sharma'
  Cc: 'Sharma, Vivek', 'stable@dpdk.org',
	'dev@dpdk.org'



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dumitrescu, Cristian
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 6:12 PM
> To: Vivek Sharma <vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>
> Cc: Sharma, Vivek <Vivek.Sharma@cavium.com>; stable@dpdk.org;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] eal: use correct data type for slab operations
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Vivek Sharma [mailto:vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com]
> > Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 4:50 PM
> > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> > Cc: Sharma, Vivek <Vivek.Sharma@cavium.com>; stable@dpdk.org;
> > dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] eal: use correct data type for slab operations
> >
> > + dev.
> > +cristian(Bitmap maintainer)
> >
> > Please review.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Monday 24 September 2018 09:08 PM, Vivek Sharma wrote:
> > > Currently, slab operations use unsigned long data type for 64-bit slab
> > > related operations. On target 'i686-native-linuxapp-gcc', unsigned long
> > > is 32-bit and thus, slab operations breaks on this target. Changing slab
> > > operations to use unsigned long long for correct functioning on all
> targets.
> > >
> > > Fixes: de3cfa2c9823 ("sched: initial import")
> > > Fixes: 693f715da45c ("remove extra parentheses in return statement")
> > > CC: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Sharma <vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>
> > > ---
> > >  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h | 14 +++++++-------
> > >  test/test/test_bitmap.c                    | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> 
> Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>

Applied to next-qos tree, thanks!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-08 15:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <1537803523-23347-1-git-send-email-vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>
2018-09-24 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] eal: use correct data type for slab operations Vivek Sharma
2018-09-24 17:12   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-10-08 15:57     ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-09-25  9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: use correct data type for bitmap " Vivek Sharma

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).