From: "Dewar, Alan" <ad759e@intl.att.com>
To: "'Dumitrescu, Cristian'" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
"'alangordondewar@gmail.com'" <alangordondewar@gmail.com>
Cc: "'dev@dpdk.org'" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"'Alan Dewar'" <alan.dewar@att.com>,
"'Kantecki, Tomasz'" <tomasz.kantecki@intel.com>,
"'Singh, Jasvinder'" <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] sched: make RED scaling configurable
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 09:38:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F9268EEC0E43747A5FFFC6B48EF0321FC0CAF@gbcdcmbx03.intl.att.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891267BAFB4EE@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi Cristian,
Responses inline below.
Regards
Alan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dumitrescu, Cristian [mailto:cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 1:11 PM
> To: alangordondewar@gmail.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Alan Dewar <alan.dewar@att.com>; Kantecki, Tomasz <tomasz.kantecki@intel.com>; Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] sched: make RED scaling configurable
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> More issues and questions below:
>
>...<snip>
>
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_sched/rte_red.c b/lib/librte_sched/rte_red.h
> I suggest we use uint32_t for rte_red_scaling and rte_red_max_threshold, even though their values can fit into uint8_t and uint16_t respectively.
Will do.
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_sched/rte_red.c b/lib/librte_sched/rte_red.c
> > +int
> > +rte_red_set_scaling(uint16_t max_red_queue_length) {
> > + int8_t count;
> > +
> > + if (rte_red_init_done)
> > + /**
> > + * Can't change the scaling once the red table has been
> > + * computed.
> > + */
> > + return -1;
>
> Is there a reason why we cannot simply reset the scaling here?
Actually we could, but I was originally thinking that you might be happier keeping with a one-time RED initialization function, but then had to introduce the rte_reset_red_scaling function for the unit-tests. I'm happy to do RED reinitialization here, if you are.
> > +
> > + if (max_red_queue_length < RTE_RED_MIN_QUEUE_LENGTH)
> > + return -2;
> > +
> > + if (max_red_queue_length > RTE_RED_MAX_QUEUE_LENGTH)
> > + return -3;
> > +
> > + if (!rte_is_power_of_2(max_red_queue_length))
> > + return -4;
> > +
> > + count = 0;
> > + while (max_red_queue_length != 0) {
> > + max_red_queue_length >>= 1;
> > + count++;
> > + }
>
> This does not look right to me. I think you want to compute the log2 of max_red_queue_length here, but your result (count) is bigger by 1 than it should be, right?
> When max_red_queue_length = RTE_RED_DEFAULT_QUEUE_LENGTH = 1024, the result should be: count = RTE_RED_SCALING = 10, not 11.
>
Well spotted.
> I suggest you use rte_bsf32() function for this purpose.
I wasn't aware of this function, it appears to do the necessary so will do.
> > +
> > + rte_red_scaling -= count - RTE_RED_SCALING;
>
> Why not simply: rte_red_scaling = count?
Stupidity on my part! - Will do.
> > + rte_red_max_threshold = max_red_queue_length - 1;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched_version.map
> > b/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched_version.map
> > index 3aa159a..262bece 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched_version.map
> > +++ b/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched_version.map
> > @@ -29,3 +29,10 @@ DPDK_2.1 {
> > rte_sched_port_pkt_read_color;
> >
> > } DPDK_2.0;
> > +
> > +DPDK_17.08 {
> > + global;
> > +
> > + __rte_red_reset;
> > + rte_red_set_scaling;
> > +} DPDK_2.1;
>
> You need to put the correct DPDK release number here.
Will do.
> You also need to do more work to make sure the share library support is not broken:
> -need to increase LIBABIVER in Makefile
> -need to update the library .so number in release notes -need to check that build does not fail for shared libraries
>
> (You can use this patch as example: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dpdk.org_dev_patchwork_patch_33109_&d=DwIFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=MSobi4bsl2plY_3b1jvY6kXt-SHzSxMj5YhuyxfTjJE&m=D7OTgDyX27pcg-xs8N7FQzX4lAkkcPqbPAhJp_IyrNI&s=mCvsqitq8Y6vD3UC-r1WEGtrRp17bsmJaEHGby97zYw&e= )
Okay, I need to look into this stuff - I'll come back with some questions if anything isn't clear.
> > diff --git a/test/test/test_red.c b/test/test/test_red.c
> The RED test code fails to link, please fix:
Yes - will do.
> export RTE_TARGET=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
>
> [ ]$ ~/git_dpdk_red/dpdk$ make -C test/test
> make: Entering directory 'dpdk/test/test'
>...<snip>
> LD test
> test_red.o: In function `test_rte_red_init':
> test_red.c:(.text+0x2cd): undefined reference to `__rte_red_reset'
> test_red.c:(.text+0x2da): undefined reference to `rte_red_set_scaling'
> test_red.c:(.text+0x2ed): undefined reference to `rte_red_max_threshold'
> test_red.o: In function `increase_actual_qsize':
> test_red.c:(.text+0x48c): undefined reference to `rte_red_scaling'
> test_red.c:(.text+0x533): undefined reference to `rte_red_scaling'
> test_red.o: In function `enqueue_dequeue_func':
> test_red.c:(.text+0x70c): undefined reference to `rte_red_scaling'
> test_red.c:(.text+0x7a5): undefined reference to `rte_red_scaling'
> test_red.o: In function `increase_average_qsize':
> test_red.c:(.text+0x95c): undefined reference to `rte_red_scaling'
> test_red.o:test_red.c:(.text+0x9f1): more undefined references to `rte_red_scaling' follow
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> dpdk/mk/rte.app.mk:306: recipe for target 'test' failed
> make: *** [test] Error 1
> make: Leaving directory 'dpdk/test/test'
>
> Regards,
> Cristian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-12 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1507022514-21831-1>
2018-01-08 15:27 ` alangordondewar
2018-01-11 13:11 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-12 9:38 ` Dewar, Alan [this message]
2018-01-12 11:09 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-12 11:52 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-15 15:36 ` Dewar, Alan
2018-01-16 11:56 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-12 10:44 ` Dewar, Alan
2018-01-12 11:43 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-15 16:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " alangordondewar
2018-01-15 16:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-01-16 15:50 ` Alan Dewar
2018-01-16 15:57 ` Alan Dewar
2018-01-16 16:44 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-16 16:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " alangordondewar
2019-04-05 15:36 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-05 15:36 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-08 8:24 ` Alan Dewar
2019-04-08 8:24 ` Alan Dewar
2019-04-08 8:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-08 8:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-08 13:29 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2019-04-08 13:29 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2020-07-06 23:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F9268EEC0E43747A5FFFC6B48EF0321FC0CAF@gbcdcmbx03.intl.att.com \
--to=ad759e@intl.att.com \
--cc=alan.dewar@att.com \
--cc=alangordondewar@gmail.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
--cc=tomasz.kantecki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).