DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: add support for forced ethernet speed
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:25:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a90da98-da41-70fb-2b6b-99e68c260b62@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210222191824.40230-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>

On 2/22/2021 7:18 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> Add support for forced ethernet speed setting.
> Currently testpmd tries to configure the Ethernet port in autoneg mode.
> It is not possible to set the Ethernet port to a specific speed while
> starting testpmd. In some cases capability to configure a forced speed
> for the Ethernet port during initialization may be necessary. This patch
> tries to add this support.
> 
> The patch assumes full duplex setting and does not attempt to change that.
> So speeds like 10M, 100M are not configurable using this method.
> 
> The command line to configure a forced speed of 10G:
> dpdk-testpmd -c 0xff  -- -i  --eth-link-speed  10000
> 
> The command line to configure a forced speed of 50G:
> dpdk-testpmd -c 0xff  -- -i  --eth-link-speed  50000
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
> ---
>   app/test-pmd/parameters.c             | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   app/test-pmd/testpmd.c                |  4 +++
>   app/test-pmd/testpmd.h                |  1 +
>   doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst | 11 +++++++
>   4 files changed, 58 insertions(+)

Can you also update the release notes to document the new parameter?

> 
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/parameters.c b/app/test-pmd/parameters.c
> index c8acd5d1b7..e10f7d38fb 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/parameters.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/parameters.c
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ usage(char* progname)
>   	printf("  --hairpin-mode=0xXX: bitmask set the hairpin port mode.\n "
>   	       "    0x10 - explicit Tx rule, 0x02 - hairpin ports paired\n"
>   	       "    0x01 - hairpin ports loop, 0x00 - hairpin port self\n");
> +	printf("  --eth-link-speed: forced link speed.\n");
>   }
>   
>   #ifdef RTE_LIB_CMDLINE
> @@ -485,6 +486,41 @@ parse_event_printing_config(const char *optarg, int enable)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int
> +parse_link_speed(int n)
> +{
> +	uint32_t speed;
> +
> +	switch (n) {

OK to not support "10M, 100M", not sure if anybody really uses them, but what do 
you think checking them and return an error?

> +	case 1000:
> +		speed = ETH_LINK_SPEED_1G;
> +		break;
> +	case 10000:
> +		speed = ETH_LINK_SPEED_10G;
> +		break;
> +	case 25000:
> +		speed = ETH_LINK_SPEED_25G;
> +		break;
> +	case 40000:
> +		speed = ETH_LINK_SPEED_40G;
> +		break;
> +	case 50000:
> +		speed = ETH_LINK_SPEED_50G;
> +		break;
> +	case 100000:
> +		speed = ETH_LINK_SPEED_100G;
> +		break;
> +	case 200000:
> +		speed = ETH_LINK_SPEED_200G;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		speed = ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG;
> +		break;

Isn't this function to set a fixed link speed, why falling back to autoneg?

Also shouldn't this function set 'ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED' too?

> +	}
> +
> +	return speed;
> +}
> +
>   void
>   launch_args_parse(int argc, char** argv)
>   {
> @@ -605,6 +641,7 @@ launch_args_parse(int argc, char** argv)
>   		{ "rx-mq-mode",                 1, 0, 0 },
>   		{ "record-core-cycles",         0, 0, 0 },
>   		{ "record-burst-stats",         0, 0, 0 },
> +		{ "eth-link-speed",		1, 0, 0 },
>   		{ 0, 0, 0, 0 },
>   	};
>   
> @@ -1366,6 +1403,11 @@ launch_args_parse(int argc, char** argv)
>   				record_core_cycles = 1;
>   			if (!strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "record-burst-stats"))
>   				record_burst_stats = 1;
> +			if (!strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "eth-link-speed")) {
> +				n = atoi(optarg);
> +				if (n >= 0 && parse_link_speed(n) >= 0)
> +					eth_link_speed = parse_link_speed(n);
> +			}
>   			break;
>   		case 'h':
>   			usage(argv[0]);
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> index caa711d6f3..9434e335a0 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> @@ -535,6 +535,8 @@ uint16_t gso_max_segment_size = RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN - RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN;
>   /* Holds the registered mbuf dynamic flags names. */
>   char dynf_names[64][RTE_MBUF_DYN_NAMESIZE];
>   
> +uint32_t eth_link_speed;
> +

Can you please move this a little up, at the beginning of the 'testpmd.c' there 
are global config variables, this can go next to them.

And can you please add a single line comment to the variable, as done in all 
other ones.

>   /*
>    * Helper function to check if socket is already discovered.
>    * If yes, return positive value. If not, return zero.
> @@ -1484,6 +1486,8 @@ init_config(void)
>   			port->tx_conf[k].offloads =
>   				port->dev_conf.txmode.offloads;
>   
> +		port->dev_conf.link_speeds = eth_link_speed;
> +

This is set even user doesn't provide '--eth-link-speed' at all, in that case I 
assume it relies on the fact that variable default value (0) is the same as 
'AUTONEG' value (0). So it sets speed to autoneg in that case.
But what do you think to be more explicit, and set this only if the user 
provided the device argument, like:
	if (eth_link_speed)
		port->dev_conf.link_speeds = eth_link_speed;


This sets the same link speed for all ports, do you think may we need capability 
to set link speed per port? Does it worth the complexity it brings?

>   		/* set flag to initialize port/queue */
>   		port->need_reconfig = 1;
>   		port->need_reconfig_queues = 1;
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> index 60ddeb8f13..a3cd4a0e16 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.h
> @@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ extern bool setup_on_probe_event; /**< disabled by port setup-on iterator */
>   extern uint8_t hot_plug; /**< enable by "--hot-plug" parameter */
>   extern int do_mlockall; /**< set by "--mlockall" or "--no-mlockall" parameter */
>   extern uint8_t clear_ptypes; /**< disabled by set ptype cmd */
> +extern uint32_t eth_link_speed;
>   
>   #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_BYPASS
>   extern uint32_t bypass_timeout; /**< Store the NIC bypass watchdog timeout */
> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst
> index 6745072329..a856f52736 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst
> @@ -536,3 +536,14 @@ The command line options are:
>       bit 1 - two hairpin ports paired
>       bit 0 - two hairpin ports loop
>       The default value is 0. Hairpin will use single port mode and implicit Tx flow mode.
> +
> +*   ``--eth-link-speed``
> +

Should this document that "10M, 100M" is not supported?

> +    Set a forced link speed to the ethernet port.
> +    1000 - 1Gbps
> +    10000 - 10Gbps
> +    25000 - 25Gbps
> +    40000 - 40Gbps
> +    50000 - 50Gbps
> +    100000 - 100Gbps
> +    200000 - 200Gbps

What do you think to put something like "..." to very bottom, to clarify this is 
not full list, so that we won't need to update this each time we add a new speed?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-25 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-22 19:18 Ajit Khaparde
2021-02-25 18:25 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2021-02-26  6:43   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-02-26 11:21     ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-02-26 16:18       ` Andrew Boyer
2021-03-01 12:20         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-01  4:47       ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-03-12  8:45       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-05  4:15   ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-03-05  4:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ajit Khaparde
2021-03-05 16:53       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-05 19:42         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Ajit Khaparde
2021-03-08 11:03           ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-02-25 18:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Andrew Boyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3a90da98-da41-70fb-2b6b-99e68c260b62@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).