DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bpf: delete meaningless code
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 19:39:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c12602c-cb0d-1269-dc1e-774844c2e059@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB44912A4B869C4811D69CEF1E9A469@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>



在 2021/4/22 19:29, Ananyev, Konstantin 写道:
> 
>   
>>
>> 在 2021/4/21 19:43, Ananyev, Konstantin 写道:
>>>>
>>>> 'rd->u.max = rd->u.max' is meaningless which should be deleted.
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixed it.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 8021917293d0 ("bpf: add extra validation for input BPF program")
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> As I remember, I did it on purpose.
>>> Some old (but still supported) version of clang complained
>>> about unitialized variable.
>>
>> Well, how about like this ?
>> 		uint64_t tmp = rd->u.max;
>> 		if (op == BPF_MOD)
>> 			tmp = RTE_MIN(tmp, tmp - 1);
>> 		rd->u.max = tmp;
> 
> 
> Then, I think it should be:
> tmp = RTE_MIN(tmp, rs->u.max - 1);
> 
> Or just leave things as they are right now.
> Nothing is broken here.
> 
OK, this patch can be abandoned ,thanks.
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c | 2 --
>>>>    1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c b/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c
>>>> index 9214f15..c5ad951 100644
>>>> --- a/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c
>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_bpf/bpf_validate.c
>>>> @@ -517,8 +517,6 @@ eval_divmod(uint32_t op, struct bpf_reg_val *rd, struct bpf_reg_val *rs,
>>>>    	} else {
>>>>    		if (op == BPF_MOD)
>>>>    			rd->u.max = RTE_MIN(rd->u.max, rs->u.max - 1);
>>>> -		else
>>>> -			rd->u.max = rd->u.max;
>>>>    		rd->u.min = 0;
>>>>    	}
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.7.4
>>>
>>> .
>>>
> .
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-22 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-21 11:35 Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-21 11:43 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-04-21 12:02   ` Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-22 11:29     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-04-22 11:39       ` Min Hu (Connor) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3c12602c-cb0d-1269-dc1e-774844c2e059@huawei.com \
    --to=humin29@huawei.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).