From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0696968 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 09:43:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id g17so120433643wme.1 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 00:43:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U2qhYYMdXWS1s+trtT9zacqhnI4rfYWUqdDutcENs+I=; b=If2rQ0dDUj/U7PMRyoC5Ct8zrjr7pN2eGOmV82/LcJgtJ/8t82sE4qJk+cWGDiDHD6 B70wMOIq/tpFWzSv/sfwe6FrtYOkYWYl/U8kL/YY5rfyfcLdizVZbRQ24yZk5zlQHBmZ BM8XkyLS4IU5DAQgAZYOYYI58pcAmFVw0it7HuDORn5bfQSyt+P8+DQHOEob+Jgslsqh vLbMXKOsttCBMjfFrIy73PdUFZXDVssDw+s7NgZ42QcJ5c7Ul0deKh6F7dxIGAAIRA3l LIULg0+fWEx8kc6LWJNGMwbj03dKiylmrpep5eZfFpOmv/1yczYPeabUopAUxBfcuiIx TGfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=U2qhYYMdXWS1s+trtT9zacqhnI4rfYWUqdDutcENs+I=; b=k9NeWpj1A/svHCpHs4NX0T2KkJd5nv4/WiP9KmuiO1xQ59VkDgchz0w97U4z0OpMte x/S1OYbSyy1PmsBB29vamjeqf0j+vXH43URjdWUnJgYjw4P/3NxETx1DbPbE8wE35Fbn z6isynygIocE6aR50v4KLfovjP9zqYMsVXT4sCxzyAHXhvtRmZcAZoc6RhS2CjwicqVZ aVKF3K7vm7Aat2y6P0lH+1jiKOz6riFyhkiUq8ucttUeX6Lo9O9YdO+ZbF90QWJDN28Z v6oLdePWgEzJetuxxe5Yuv6d4DSh+mWaRomjUKsccByhePrReXb8YiDQJP7JGn0eFUxb ATKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUqQ3alilftFgBuxhTfxg16vDB4Q+Y5bRCku24D1oyx31ccGW8abDSpUL5bW7uA0Tac X-Received: by 10.194.66.137 with SMTP id f9mr8101927wjt.74.1463039030082; Thu, 12 May 2016 00:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r123sm12348090wmg.20.2016.05.12.00.43.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 May 2016 00:43:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hurd Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 09:43:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4079874.Szl0fMNbYL@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Updates to large patchsets X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 07:43:50 -0000 2016-05-11 14:22, Stephen Hurd: > When submitting an update to a single patch in a large patchset, what's the > preferred method? Do I send a single "[PATCH v2 01/40]" email with the > modified patch or do I send the entire series of 40 patches again? Good question :) It's generally easier to understand if the whole series is sent. If the series is large, it is better to wait to have several changes. If you are almost sure there will be no more change except 1 or 2 small ones, then you can send only these single patches. Anyway, please keep patchwork status updated, i.e. mark old patches as superseded.