From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7288A37B4 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:25:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id i5so138593448wmg.0 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:25:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SGdRojZwv7xHv0n3B9kHTqcZAG8GcSBtDJ1s/+B4/O8=; b=gre8Xe0oI96FEmRnd2E8A229IfmLzQeNF6GjwTf+NAfPKmJ0oPoZlqUnjSbIPcR67g gI50a5ZjaniiCldEUrxrP2ujTCO05NAV94yrd07NAwMkQYGmcVSJfJLy0miwzyUPmoTm 25lzbNJclms+s0lnvffb8dRwp1NwvIQm7TP8rWTyyDogTFzVXjingLWUMX4qbQBhLMGF FmmvivtI0o+hm+2JgbBH7JoQed9BEUnw0ugf1kD3lFSncWH/dTRy8C6n9AWuWeJsMutd RuKQEMGwifJ7sk/ev13KSdYhZABq7TxRV2+dMCwFiRWrBArPivYEldVMHgVbnyN6NLGe Y+cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SGdRojZwv7xHv0n3B9kHTqcZAG8GcSBtDJ1s/+B4/O8=; b=Re7Pcv/Wnje9uCK65NGsJugUf07IZNDNz9VRudweuqMT6jxQffgzQ5WnOZDeeZlBpM Db4V3anIzpqLa/RenFdRCG/3/JifQJzi0P4Scex71Mzh27et6Wfzfs0kaxoGI8DPx/oV VpNHaMGAVYb23XjyiI4s+Kx/PwXI68nWJW3BdDnLEbYtOQyheFXOrk5nY003rXhKI9IR SpsGK3F/tlq3v+h3MoKUEjYK3bxUWigpPqvNXm5DL1WUVL7Dwo6AxW0ePCtro7W2DfAF 1PUs3YHEPZkFW5Jd9anpH5sKDzxjPRLgPJ/cSH0BAqwWcs+fvsyokmjSMIypCcSG2dA3 wUZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouukVYaPowdR122lVpMn1XCauQeVZzSxrsNJa/oOFDTGZ+B2qUhVNTPuog1oOr/vwzFa X-Received: by 10.28.153.70 with SMTP id b67mr15953926wme.84.1471865112237; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (171.17.90.79.rev.sfr.net. [79.90.17.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v134sm20840488wmf.10.2016.08.22.04.25.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:25:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Reshma Pattan Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:25:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4141702.2z8BGRLWcg@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1471273328-16390-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com> References: <1471273328-16390-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:12 -0000 2016-08-15 16:02, Reshma Pattan: > The GCC 4.9 -march option supports the intel code names for processors, > for example -march=silvermont, -march=broadwell. > The RTE_MACHINE config flag can be used to pass code name to > the compiler as -march flag. Also old gcc versions compatibility code > for the intel platform is removed from > mk/toolchain/gcc/rte.toolchain-compat.mk Do you mean to not support GCC < 4.9 ?