DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	<ferruh.yigit@amd.com>, <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
	<david.hunt@intel.com>, <sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com>,
	<david.marchand@redhat.com>, <liuyonglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] power: introduce PM QoS API on CPU wide
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:32:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41ee70c3-5113-5c3e-7a5a-56e34bc9fffe@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6796230.uz5P2jW1tq@thomas>


在 2024/6/19 23:32, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
> 19/06/2024 08:31, Huisong Li:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/lib/power/rte_power_qos.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>> + * Copyright(c) 2024 HiSilicon Limited
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef RTE_POWER_QOS_H
>> +#define RTE_POWER_QOS_H
>> +
>> +#include <rte_compat.h>
>> +
>> +#ifdef __cplusplus
>> +extern "C" {
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * @file rte_power_qos.h
>> + *
>> + * PM QoS API.
>> + *
>> + * The CPU-wide resume latency limit has a positive impact on this CPU's idle
>> + * state selection in each cpuidle governor.
>> + * Please see the PM QoS on CPU wide in the following link:
>> + * https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/abi-testing.html?highlight=pm_qos_resume_latency_us#abi-sys-devices-power-pm-qos-resume-latency-us
>> + *
>> + * The deeper the idle state, the lower the power consumption, but the
>> + * longer the resume time. Some service are delay sensitive and very except the
>> + * low resume time, like interrupt packet receiving mode.
>> + *
>> + * In these case, per-CPU PM QoS API can be used to control this CPU's idle
>> + * state selection and limit just enter the shallowest idle state to low the
>> + * delay after sleep by setting strict resume latency (zero value).
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define RTE_POWER_QOS_STRICT_LATENCY_VALUE             0
>> +#define RTE_POWER_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY_NO_CONSTRAINT    ((int)(UINT32_MAX >> 1))
> stdint.h include is missing
Yes, it desn't satisfy self-contained header files.
will add it in next version, thanks.
>
>
>
> .

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-20  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-20 10:55 [PATCH 0/2] introduce PM QoS interface Huisong Li
2024-03-20 10:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] power: " Huisong Li
2024-03-20 10:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] examples/l3fwd-power: add PM QoS request configuration Huisong Li
2024-03-20 14:05 ` [PATCH 0/2] introduce PM QoS interface Morten Brørup
2024-03-21  3:04   ` lihuisong (C)
2024-03-21 13:30     ` Morten Brørup
2024-03-22  8:54       ` lihuisong (C)
2024-03-22 12:35         ` Morten Brørup
2024-03-26  2:11           ` lihuisong (C)
2024-03-26  8:27             ` Morten Brørup
2024-03-26 12:15               ` lihuisong (C)
2024-03-26 12:46                 ` Morten Brørup
2024-03-29  1:59                   ` lihuisong (C)
2024-03-22 17:55         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-03-26  2:20           ` lihuisong (C)
2024-03-26 16:04             ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-06-13 11:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] power: " Huisong Li
2024-06-13 11:20   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] power: introduce PM QoS API on CPU wide Huisong Li
2024-06-14  8:04     ` Morten Brørup
2024-06-18 12:19       ` lihuisong (C)
2024-06-18 12:53         ` Morten Brørup
2024-06-13 11:20   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] examples/l3fwd-power: add PM QoS configuration Huisong Li
2024-06-19  6:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] power: introduce PM QoS interface Huisong Li
2024-06-19  6:31   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] power: introduce PM QoS API on CPU wide Huisong Li
2024-06-19 14:56     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-20  2:22       ` lihuisong (C)
2024-06-19 15:32     ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-06-20  2:32       ` lihuisong (C) [this message]
2024-06-19  6:31   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/l3fwd-power: add PM QoS configuration Huisong Li
2024-06-19 14:54     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-20  2:24       ` lihuisong (C)
2024-06-19  6:59   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] power: introduce PM QoS interface Morten Brørup
2024-06-27  6:00 ` [PATCH v4 " Huisong Li
2024-06-27  6:00   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] power: introduce PM QoS API on CPU wide Huisong Li
2024-06-27 15:06     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-06-28  4:07       ` lihuisong (C)
2024-06-27  6:00   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] examples/l3fwd-power: add PM QoS configuration Huisong Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41ee70c3-5113-5c3e-7a5a-56e34bc9fffe@huawei.com \
    --to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=sivaprasad.tummala@amd.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).