From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980904CA7 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 10:36:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4A921AAD; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 04:36:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 03 Oct 2018 04:36:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=pc9U1nygp5LWaHvd2FGZLfZRPbJ0etRdmzzoUTvyqSM=; b=AKXW1vFk1nDG 0a370MveRXUEqSCqcRz0G9PzwNU0sw4qsd1h6vu8DBkxfgmoUC8lyGi82OXYY2CF m6hoG/+Ph/0CW1d+67eYZMBcg7uLlFII048BuataU3w4CR1gIA4VDeqc+xoJB3uB cheky8vULAt/rTEj0A0zJX386Hs3hQU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=pc9U1nygp5LWaHvd2FGZLfZRPbJ0etRdmzzoUTvyq SM=; b=QIGx7gXiyQOPhqTIyB2EMUzXNKkU7Z32Okb8Q+n0s4wJiaaKR5DSaiIqj nC2smJuqAfCzKu4GqB/tNErz6Z1FrItkpvSkSJtngW4YfWrli2nMBglcvQa3wGg6 I2akxPt/dd91I4mUrrw6GpmbVfowMgPunRt83s2wSpfBt2A+HMzkcvUmE0LB5iGz xaVKTr7BSFRYEvk+LZNBXbwGCgoq2+sCVceYkJtJsoGPudG9bcYfHqHJTaGz5YtS ceUtuTU6YxCMIknji94qIaJ/cYJJzaQAJb+GNBU3NHap7Hz/fWzcYnc32VnUCg+w tdXvvnQumaUbntXzgdF0KYKtzp6Qw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0727EE49DF; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 04:36:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit , Jerin Jacob Cc: Andrew Rybchenko , Wenzhuo Lu , Jingjing Wu , Bernard Iremonger , John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic , Olivier Matz , dev@dpdk.org, shahafs@mellanox.com Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:36:50 +0200 Message-ID: <4277755.JZm9Gr5mod@xps> In-Reply-To: <0079b011-100f-1699-356f-80648abcb36f@intel.com> References: <20180913134707.23698-1-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <20181003075823.GB2003@jerin> <0079b011-100f-1699-356f-80648abcb36f@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] ethdev: add Tx offload outer UDP checksum definition X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:36:54 -0000 03/10/2018 10:02, Ferruh Yigit: > On 10/3/2018 8:58 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > From: Andrew Rybchenko > >> The question about mbuf and ethdev changes separation is applicable here as > >> well. I have no strong opinion, but I think it would be good to follow. > > > > I don't have strong opinion on this. If there are no other objection, I > > will split the patch further as mbuf and ethdev as you pointed out. > > Since they are logically related, it make sense to have them together to me. +1 for keeping ethdev/mbuf together. No problem applying such mbuf change in dpdk-next-net.