From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D83A00C5; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:15:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0D71DA51; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:15:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172EF1DA4D for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:14:59 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: gNKHAru5apJadd2Si4e0fE5fstKl0bMpKkGNcCgaBuwZ+8dZqWJBC5OIMG+H3A6ObeR+oAtN7B lOT/9iFqutbw== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Apr 2020 02:14:59 -0700 IronPort-SDR: da2P4j7Bzt/FL6FYaE9MhfQloZNoDssuhlNBf5i8XTaAWpgzGsoVFkDIA6sbW9oHowrQ6QWgA2 OX8H6bQlbQOw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,334,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="337239548" Received: from aburakov-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.32.101]) ([10.249.32.101]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2020 02:14:57 -0700 To: =?UTF-8?B?6ZmI5Lqa6L6JLeS6keadieeglOWPkemDqA==?= Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jiping@yunshan.net, xiangyang@yunshan.net, David Marchand References: From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: <42a59c31-ccd4-f7b2-a1c2-e0ff20921145@intel.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 10:14:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] eal: can not run secondary process on openstack environment X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 30-Apr-20 5:14 AM, 陈亚辉-云杉研发部 wrote: > Deleting xdg_runtime_dir and fallback, runtime_dir will always be > "/var/run" defined by code: > static const char *default_runtime_dir = "/var/run" > I'm not sure this is a good solution. Generally, IMO, having separate directories for DPDK processes for different users is a good thing. Also, XDG directory exists for a reason, and i think on some distros /var/run is not even there any more (or symlinked to /run, or...). So, i don't think this is the way to go. David, thoughts? -- Thanks, Anatoly