From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57C4591E for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:49:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id r141so5337847wmg.1 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:49:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r97/EKdkcKIDHbBzCunE00QmNW/mL4i2kWwxqQmSlWM=; b=OBQFvRu7Znq76lw68pknw/b5puvfd2aEDo9BHSp+6k1iQaYGA97PRYDOHlv1Axsqd9 6xu3hh9EFXKqnmtDhyblWQH367Ddxno2SZtZb8Mxhd7J2Ys7x0JFO9b1hs1V4+fOXFM3 ZMg1g+t9mGUqXhuIEYdHK9koPRTJBC0Wd7gxCOoObMUT3KZL0T9zmnAGPp8HrXJclO21 FuWZE0G7G4x72H3oirjMpamPYdk+B02UBh1cQQ3vFiiv1wI3QrEH1AAI/NBS6aV9hNyP 87mQ3fbfMI/ZCu2LZwQnrK3I1VzjJiOVwLGMmCbU4nyo/i4j10bRejmV7KrFGfc2UofG EdBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r97/EKdkcKIDHbBzCunE00QmNW/mL4i2kWwxqQmSlWM=; b=uaWXwg3MP17vv//Nc9d4eBuXvgbZPv7A+GBb/4w5Isy4D6EXMFXy064xaXWM0s+fke gbVHTy81jdC28hIJSNqfLLrYmlaS5/Ved6lg315BkBXFETV+3gTiqGT7O9i44G1+1Tj0 RZIH73Aylft5rHcyJJGnBl+b+bUDkcSOWL4CKUqIyQC00x0abvzf+GTIKVPdvR1cz/hz 78HH2OsN6JvkUAcXCPpPZbmuw96u1+1crJnODJDUoTUPF84twkl9/3spk0A4ADqGfIA5 jCpDWbyqtuIeYFzquoAyMvlFoajV2HJvjP32t3su3K+z0KuaIVsMOcPM20/inL4nvKwS xn5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kHN8v2P74j8BMo1fAtIGmWnQhPnXn/NmigmJz7GoueAdyynZPzRlSkI6NUHW7XK9e+ X-Received: by 10.28.172.68 with SMTP id v65mr1695325wme.111.1487839757744; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:49:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (112.204.154.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.154.204.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i203sm5396551wmf.12.2017.02.23.00.49.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:49:16 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Joao Martins Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Vincent JARDIN , "Tan, Jianfeng" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com, Xen-devel Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:49:15 +0100 Message-ID: <4346357.L5KG7J6tvv@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <58AB0C46.5020601@oracle.com> References: <1478504326-68105-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> <20170217160731.GA30539@char.us.ORACLE.com> <58AB0C46.5020601@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:49:18 -0000 2017-02-20 15:33, Joao Martins: > On 02/17/2017 04:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > >> Le 16/02/2017 =E0 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a =E9crit : > >>>> Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support? > >>> So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is wa= iting > >>> for review of xen-devel to the spec. > >>> > >>> And I believe the implementation does utilize some of the dom0 > >>> parts of code in DPDK. > >> > >> Please, do you have URLs/pointers about it? It would be interestin= g to share > >> it with DPDK community too. > >=20 > > Joao, would it be possible to include an tarball of the patches? I = know > > they are no in the right state with the review of the staging > > grants API - they are incompatible, but it may help folks to get > > a feel for what DPDK APIs you used? > OK, see attached - I should note that its a WIP as Konrad noted, but = once the > staging grants work is finished, the code would be improved to have i= t in better > shape (as well as in feature parity) for a proper RFC [and adhering t= o the > project coding style]. Excuse my ignorance on Xen. Is xen-netback for Dom0? Is the DPDK Dom0 support working and useful?