From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6877AA0C41; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:05:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506664003F; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:05:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.224]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D337F4003E for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:05:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4F058091B; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:05:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 May 2021 12:05:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= ye6j/XvdMefDA/A56l8a3xGdTrIf7Sk4IioFwJoGFgI=; b=LFPOR71D6Qf0C7HD 18FIZ+lurA403gKY020LWgkG6bdRI8RQ0LYG8xWWPMTJPxJauDXsWn4rMDcOdrrP 349BfS04fAjGGbgjqKaVViUvrcilx7f7q1ZOClSNNLHxVjU3Dwu7lLlVSnEETHRr esJOKsD2XCS5RQV9I9JCB0Pia/kAK5tUfQ+1hiFeYqwUM7/bzBAljIabDCFXiBfh A8quN3iFDvtghKjsyzZyYveN5Ptimo/HRsLeD+MGyOPVFjZU8Zzcg9FFvasKqgUx NXerPn1NuC3HWkyzhCfW9rNn1EDCoNaqEBQE3tEzDwCMg02i8VjhLZFLB3l3SKnt /2PEEA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ye6j/XvdMefDA/A56l8a3xGdTrIf7Sk4IioFwJoGF gI=; b=Rwq113gVFLD4xFVU2Zs5fJlUXsqasKFDMsg2kQulnSf8+13vWXGe755b4 VNy2bUE+uuy3x4U0gm7Wo6QPX1YINureDrNpCwrOm25qpf2zJUtk4mtfwEJpEY9e k06Oe9aAU2ubIddHkrO7G4LehOmbv/cLFp4MIhDXah0mP2CfL321gCOQvF7l/DBY 6xSCzTQyyQ8pVlBd2g1d8Xx3qCbPaeaK/mnO5wi+EDfzntjcCR+J7TxQZO/RsTyY bQ2EWi/Fymw7PWRk7iMeavepeZVXiccHu8K5GXIZ8ZRL1M5Eh97i7fMZJt4pF+57 TSVFoelhW8gK2dTYuo4vrkGD8OaLw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdehvddgleefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:05:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ciara Power , Akhil Goyal Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "declan.doherty@intel.com" , "aconole@redhat.com" , "hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" , Anoob Joseph , "ruifeng.wang@arm.com" , "asomalap@amd.com" , "ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" , "g.singh@nxp.com" , "roy.fan.zhang@intel.com" Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 18:05:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4347689.mQGEhl1lfM@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210512113655.568814-1-ciara.power@intel.com> <17245202.EenqpPWYet@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 0/7] test: refactor crypto unit test framework X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 12/05/2021 18:00, Akhil Goyal: > > I see this patchset is merged in the crypto tree but I guess it is not definitive. > > Am I right it is too late to do such refactoring after -rc2? > > What is the intent? > > > The case is not failing in my testing. Neither it is reproducible at Ciara's end. > Ciara has asked to rerun the CI to check if it is false positive. > I don't want to defer this series as it passes all test except the CI and has been > Reviewed by multiple people. > I am merging this patch for RC2. If there is any issue, it can be fixed in RC3 -rc2 was closed last week. I am supposed to close -rc3 today. Do you confirm it is OK to pull today?