* [dpdk-dev] Removal of IP version from packet offload feature flags
@ 2015-08-31 8:03 Martin Drašar
2015-08-31 8:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Drašar @ 2015-08-31 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Hi,
I just tried to upgrade to 2.1.0 and suddenly my code stopped compiling,
because of using PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR feature flag and the like. In the
rte_mbuf.h there is this code:
> #ifndef RTE_NEXT_ABI
> #define PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR (1ULL << 5) /**< RX packet with IPv4 header. */
> #define PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR_EXT (1ULL << 6) /**< RX packet with extended IPv4 header. */
> #define PKT_RX_IPV6_HDR (1ULL << 7) /**< RX packet with IPv6 header. */
> #define PKT_RX_IPV6_HDR_EXT (1ULL << 8) /**< RX packet with extended IPv6 header. */
> #endif /* RTE_NEXT_ABI */
So I guess that means the code got deprecated between 2.0.0 and 2.1.0,
although I did not find relevant comment in the changelog. My question
is, what should I use instead and even better - why was this change made?
Thank you,
Martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] Removal of IP version from packet offload feature flags
2015-08-31 8:03 [dpdk-dev] Removal of IP version from packet offload feature flags Martin Drašar
@ 2015-08-31 8:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
[not found] ` <55E42F25.4020406@ics.muni.cz>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-08-31 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Drašar; +Cc: dev
2015-08-31 10:03, Martin Drašar:
> I just tried to upgrade to 2.1.0 and suddenly my code stopped compiling,
> because of using PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR feature flag and the like. In the
> rte_mbuf.h there is this code:
>
> > #ifndef RTE_NEXT_ABI
> > #define PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR (1ULL << 5) /**< RX packet with IPv4 header. */
> > #define PKT_RX_IPV4_HDR_EXT (1ULL << 6) /**< RX packet with extended IPv4 header. */
> > #define PKT_RX_IPV6_HDR (1ULL << 7) /**< RX packet with IPv6 header. */
> > #define PKT_RX_IPV6_HDR_EXT (1ULL << 8) /**< RX packet with extended IPv6 header. */
> > #endif /* RTE_NEXT_ABI */
In order to keep compatibility with your old code, you have to disable
RTE_NEXT_ABI in your configuration file (.config).
> So I guess that means the code got deprecated between 2.0.0 and 2.1.0,
> although I did not find relevant comment in the changelog. My question
> is, what should I use instead and even better - why was this change made?
See "Extended packet type support" in
http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_1.html
and
http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] Removal of IP version from packet offload feature flags
[not found] ` <55E42F25.4020406@ics.muni.cz>
@ 2015-08-31 12:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-08-31 12:47 ` Martin Drašar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-08-31 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Drašar; +Cc: dev
2015-08-31 12:40, Martin Drašar:
> Dne 31.8.2015 v 10:56 Thomas Monjalon napsal(a):
> > In order to keep compatibility with your old code, you have to disable
> > RTE_NEXT_ABI in your configuration file (.config).
>
> I have done this and the code works, but because the project is in
> prototype stage, I would like to keep it working with the newest version.
>
> > See "Extended packet type support" in
> > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_1.html
> > and
> > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.html
> >
>
> Now I remember that I read this. However, nowhere I see possible values
> for the packet_type. Is it documented somewhere, or will this be
> documented in upcoming release?
It does not appear in doxygen (patch welcome) but it is documented.
Check RTE_PTYPE_* in lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] Removal of IP version from packet offload feature flags
2015-08-31 12:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2015-08-31 12:47 ` Martin Drašar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Drašar @ 2015-08-31 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: dev
Dne 31.8.2015 v 14:22 Thomas Monjalon napsal(a):
> It does not appear in doxygen (patch welcome) but it is documented.
> Check RTE_PTYPE_* in lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
Thanks! I was looking, but not good enough.
Indeed the defines are there and everything is working again :-)
However, I have no idea why the documentation does not show up in html,
when it is in the code...
Martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-31 12:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-31 8:03 [dpdk-dev] Removal of IP version from packet offload feature flags Martin Drašar
2015-08-31 8:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
[not found] ` <55E42F25.4020406@ics.muni.cz>
2015-08-31 12:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-08-31 12:47 ` Martin Drašar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).