From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36312A0547; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 18:26:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE26B160722; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 18:26:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1CE16071A for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 18:26:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A305C0181; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:26:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 12:26:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= k6NG4WNfcUm5TLyq4hTHx0pzxxd8zvAsBHrsgStr/eg=; b=Qwvc7zEiDUodBrSA PdaKNcGrQvkMLLTGHOMoj1pKcuhquI3fNB1wPVp6F1EMETkf4mgjLRmK7MhmotB0 4srBQmjzlIMNrE+BMwsmmVZ3t4XDeFIz3NPtJ6lXaHh22aO37yjuP8Zz4s6hJo33 IMbU0+APb5EH2Qic5u7LusseySWC8htxJBGDtiATbBbNxZQLxYFjUZNJwNWZUqOE crqo2fsWzz64+gmw85TEnzd2UgVQfKdn8WTVC0cSJlJYU5FV0oo1cLW5Lk32J0cP TU1+epE9110HRp8hLoeRR4fxKme3lV7sa3FPp6aB4txsTNR4KiRpXbY0gHeboFRk mJ+YdQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=k6NG4WNfcUm5TLyq4hTHx0pzxxd8zvAsBHrsgStr/ eg=; b=kWTkLW3jicvrau6nX4dm6/5EjaQQA6Mcj25NopGpFANapjng/m9apoJDs W1Ibp5KVDLLQOi/URN/c6FI9m66bXrsKAJgpZCHK3Ek4+8S/95dEPH7kh3DWMsov /8bl1RZGHpuLKDL3yYB8HoB7oCviodXePh3yQ9aRyJbmFbKmoOBdBSubO1NOGyXy W111hOirQ+IwQeMmIDvQoYNsBIRobW9V3WsLerD3mNYPbZuCI5C1+qa7oOegwn7g gYlnY/nSaj7t5mpVInZSIBdF4Z517bdz5XllPzNd1vzl881PPQf9JQKO6byuC0Bd m5VGLEqzk1iagyiDMku7c6sKjImRw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrheefgddutddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeethedtieevhfeigeejleegudefjeehkeekteeuveeiuedvveeu tdejveehveetnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 03DE1240064; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:26:24 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Juraj =?utf-8?B?TGlua2XFoQ==?= Cc: "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , "Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com" , "Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" , "jerinjacobk@gmail.com" , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 18:26:22 +0100 Message-ID: <4444136.eZV0TZovs5@thomas> In-Reply-To: <9e40142140ba487cafaeb59d687e6f46@pantheon.tech> References: <1612795441-25473-1-git-send-email-juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> <2557094.JohW55DncD@thomas> <9e40142140ba487cafaeb59d687e6f46@pantheon.tech> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1] config/arm: fix clang cross part number X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 08/02/2021 17:46, Juraj Linke=C5=A1: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 08/02/2021 15:46, Juraj Linke=C5=A1: > > > I accidentally submitted this as an RFC patch. Please consider this t= o be a > > regular patch. > > > > > > With that said, Thomas, would it be possible to get this into the rel= ease? > >=20 > > Yes > >=20 > > For the sake of understanding, is it an issue due to a missing rebase? > > Or was it a miss in the testing of the patch? > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > It is an issue of not accounting for changes brought by patches before re= base, so yes, an improper rebase. OK so it is the second time we miss a rebase for the arm config rework. I should be more cautious. You can help me by notifying such dependency in advance when sending patche= s. Thanks and sorry for the trouble. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 3:44 PM > > > > To: bruce.richardson@intel.com; thomas@monjalon.net; > > > > Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com; Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com; > > > > jerinjacobk@gmail.com; ferruh.yigit@intel.com > > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > > > Subject: [RFC PATCH v1] config/arm: fix clang cross part number > > > > > > > > Rename the 'default' part number in clang cross-file to fix the fol= lowing > > issue: > > > > config/arm/meson.build:238:2: ERROR: Problem encountered: > > > > Unsupported part number default of implementer generic. Please add > > > > support for it or use the generic (-Dmachine=3Dgeneric) build. > > > > > > > > Fixes: 3d01d65ba0d3 ("config: add aarch64 clang for Ubuntu 18.04") > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > > > --- > > > > config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_clang_ubuntu1804 | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_clang_ubuntu1804 > > > > b/config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_clang_ubuntu1804 > > > > index 8d8cc50ea4..57095c1304 100644 > > > > --- a/config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_clang_ubuntu1804 > > > > +++ b/config/arm/arm64_armv8_linux_clang_ubuntu1804 > > > > @@ -15,6 +15,6 @@ endian =3D 'little' > > > > > > > > [properties] > > > > implementer_id =3D 'generic' > > > > -part_number =3D 'default' > > > > +part_number =3D 'generic' > > > > c_args =3D ['-target', 'aarch64-linux-gnu', '--sysroot', > > > > '/usr/aarch64-linux-gnu'] c_link_args =3D ['-target', > > > > 'aarch64-linux-gnu', '-fuse-ld=3Dlld', '--gcc-toolchain=3D/usr'] > > > > -- > > > > 2.20.1