From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com [67.231.154.164]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54CB1B32F for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 07:31:14 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Proofpoint Essentials engine Received: from webmail.solarflare.com (uk.solarflare.com [193.34.186.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1-us4.ppe-hosted.com (Proofpoint Essentials ESMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 7AFDEB4006B; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 06:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.38.17] (84.52.114.114) by ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 06:31:09 +0000 To: Stephen Hemminger , References: <20180126020151.979-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20180126020151.979-10-stephen@networkplumber.org> From: Andrew Rybchenko Message-ID: <45212c67-c9b9-76e1-834f-0873635cf298@solarflare.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:31:03 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180126020151.979-10-stephen@networkplumber.org> Content-Language: en-GB X-Originating-IP: [84.52.114.114] X-ClientProxiedBy: ocex03.SolarFlarecom.com (10.20.40.36) To ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-11.0.0.1191-8.100.1062-23620.002 X-TM-AS-Result: No--14.142100-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-MDID: 1516948274-lEdHGLMSZcAq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 09/15] net/sfc: use new rte_eth_linkstatus functions X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 06:31:15 -0000 On 01/26/2018 05:01 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Use the new API rte_eth_linkstatus_set to handle link status update. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > --- > drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c | 24 +++++------------------- > drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ev.c | 20 ++------------------ > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c > index 89a452907621..7d51db979a03 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c > +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c > @@ -236,22 +236,13 @@ static int > sfc_dev_link_update(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, int wait_to_complete) > { > struct sfc_adapter *sa = dev->data->dev_private; > - struct rte_eth_link *dev_link = &dev->data->dev_link; > - struct rte_eth_link old_link; > struct rte_eth_link current_link; > + int ret; > > sfc_log_init(sa, "entry"); > > -retry: > - EFX_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(*dev_link) == sizeof(rte_atomic64_t)); > - *(int64_t *)&old_link = rte_atomic64_read((rte_atomic64_t *)dev_link); > - > if (sa->state != SFC_ADAPTER_STARTED) { > sfc_port_link_mode_to_info(EFX_LINK_UNKNOWN, ¤t_link); > - if (!rte_atomic64_cmpset((volatile uint64_t *)dev_link, > - *(uint64_t *)&old_link, > - *(uint64_t *)¤t_link)) > - goto retry; > } else if (wait_to_complete) { > efx_link_mode_t link_mode; > > @@ -259,21 +250,16 @@ sfc_dev_link_update(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, int wait_to_complete) > link_mode = EFX_LINK_UNKNOWN; > sfc_port_link_mode_to_info(link_mode, ¤t_link); > > - if (!rte_atomic64_cmpset((volatile uint64_t *)dev_link, > - *(uint64_t *)&old_link, > - *(uint64_t *)¤t_link)) > - goto retry; > } else { > sfc_ev_mgmt_qpoll(sa); > - *(int64_t *)¤t_link = > - rte_atomic64_read((rte_atomic64_t *)dev_link); > + rte_eth_linkstatus_get(dev, ¤t_link); > } > > - if (old_link.link_status != current_link.link_status) > + ret = rte_eth_linkstatus_set(dev, ¤t_link); > + if (ret == 0) > sfc_info(sa, "Link status is %s", > current_link.link_status ? "UP" : "DOWN"); > - > - return old_link.link_status == current_link.link_status ? 0 : -1; > + return ret; > } > > static void These changes are OK. > diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ev.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ev.c > index 7abe61ae5ff1..273a92ccb222 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ev.c > +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ev.c > @@ -382,27 +382,11 @@ sfc_ev_link_change(void *arg, efx_link_mode_t link_mode) > { > struct sfc_evq *evq = arg; > struct sfc_adapter *sa = evq->sa; > - struct rte_eth_link *dev_link = &sa->eth_dev->data->dev_link; > struct rte_eth_link new_link; > - uint64_t new_link_u64; > - uint64_t old_link_u64; > - > - EFX_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(*dev_link) == sizeof(rte_atomic64_t)); > > sfc_port_link_mode_to_info(link_mode, &new_link); > - > - new_link_u64 = *(uint64_t *)&new_link; > - do { > - old_link_u64 = rte_atomic64_read((rte_atomic64_t *)dev_link); > - if (old_link_u64 == new_link_u64) > - break; > - > - if (rte_atomic64_cmpset((volatile uint64_t *)dev_link, > - old_link_u64, new_link_u64)) { > - evq->sa->port.lsc_seq++; > - break; > - } > - } while (B_TRUE); > + if (rte_eth_linkstatus_set(sa->eth_dev, &new_link)) > + evq->sa->port.lsc_seq++; > > return B_FALSE; > } Let me repeat part of my review notes for v4: >> lsc_seq should be incremented in the case of any changes in link, not up/down changes only and it should be preserved. << and I'd like to keep it here. Thanks to rte_atomic64_exchange() the function can be simplified to:  - convert link mode to link info (as now)  - do exchange  - compare old and new value as uint64_t and increment lsc_seq    if different Thanks.