From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85B1A04AA; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:05:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4192BA8; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:05:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D90255 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 11:05:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B77F7F; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 05:05:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 05:05:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= cyrg7Gh+GSelHIvxQDJWq77NdK2KLrTBsvnBeyEbSlo=; b=i6JclOf0UJbtSksM OwcukPR3v/WcFZGlwPOOl6pqx4Mjkvfui/Tv+0tghMavuUVbOC9seTzcy8FkNqyq 124pqnavx9CTYrYJJbeYJVJEixnqJpOh9deb/p0JhSz5eEIZjbMZBzxabKe04k7X cCHVfT0VZrjQC1q30kvt7WdCCsOgr2/vOKSQaoIcPJIV+4VXDubR6q4ehAeWuwpX sCyr3rxRpqNavsgA3gCQ0hl7OEZdQ/g/UjGIg03o+36l/EngAbkkPFi9t+z/gNx8 ZlLzZaaHe9QNOpE7wpD2I5DTf90SKak/ijsg9Xfw7gNxtTi6EiWT+IyQgbUWoBq8 Ujqqbw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=cyrg7Gh+GSelHIvxQDJWq77NdK2KLrTBsvnBeyEbS lo=; b=gnwsOXecMylCI0jRwSlez8DSCKO8FZfRSnA8yziPyw+cg8XWF8QSaMi5a goB4pAgaDQWpZXbaHW2oFJ5J3609EessY2ACBj8D/GdMQ5HF+Lzgz4bHMqN/QRYi dxmTD83qNlqBSkbSx7uS9v8En9Ib6guwUBKXONjmziF71MstD5W9Q5TKXAUsee1d Q+X/LqzN5MbQLO0kB9qVhmNheaY4wS2H8QDnwMpjuSWn+0MLENNEVjpda173qm0i XSCrLJESwBEnpxumUPeSPpPBURBUeItt2BuXbAcHaxmb/R79neWneZid50L2CKqh 0Q3Bs4LaGIvTRZf3SCvPDBaTPBYsg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehvddgudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 41B5B3280063; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 05:05:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, ciara.power@intel.com Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:05:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4545352.rp9LHxlyXs@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200908081606.GA351@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20200903152717.42095-1-ciara.power@intel.com> <20200907220711.437405-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20200908081606.GA351@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/31] remove make support in DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 08/09/2020 10:16, Bruce Richardson: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:06:40AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The first 13 commits of this series are pushed to the main branch, > > making the make-based build an old story. > > > > The last 18 commits (devtools, app and doc) are pending > > for more reviews, especially because the doc rework is > > still in progress. This is a big change which requires > > to be split but must be completed soon. > > *All*, please make the documentation update your highest priority. > > I will be reluctant to merge some driver changes if the related doc > > is not updated. > > > Thanks for the apply of the code patches, I think it will make all our > subsequent patch submissions a bit cleaner. > > In terms of docs, I believe the Linux and FreeBSD GSG guides to be ready > for merge, or if not 100% they are at least good enough IMHO to be applied > now and have some minor tweaks in subsequent patches later. While I'm sure > the Linux GSG could do with more major rework, that should be separate from > the doc updates in this patch. Of course I am not expecting any major rework in these patches, but I don't want to apply clean-up half done, which can drop some relevant informations or introduce mistakes. I will review the Linux and FreeBSD user guides first, as you suggest.