DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Kerlin, MarcinX" <marcinx.kerlin@intel.com>
Cc: "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, "De Lara Guarch,
	Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] librte_ether: ensure not overwrite device	data in mp app
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:12:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4580114.oiHn6CQCKM@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68D830D942438745AD09BAFA99E33E812AA347@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>

2016-09-22 14:11, Kerlin, MarcinX:
> Hi Reshma,
> 
> From: Pattan, Reshma
> > 
> > Hi Marcin,
> > 
> > >  /**
> > >   * @internal
> > > + * Returns a shared device data slot specified by the unique identifier name.
> > > + *
> > > + * @param	name
> > > + *  The pointer to the Unique identifier name for each shared
> > > +Ethernet device
> > > + *  between multiple processes.
> > > + * @return
> > > + *   - The pointer to the device data slot, on success. NULL on error
> > > + */
> > > +struct rte_eth_dev_data *rte_eth_dev_data_allocated(const char
> > > +*name);
> > 
> > This should be static function in source file rather than public function.
> > And name can be rte_eth_dev_get_dev_by_name() something like that?
> 
> 1) Yes should be, this function is not using outside lib now, thanks
> 2) My proposition is rte_eth_dev_get_dev_data_by_name(), because it is related with device data structure.. Do you have any objections Thomas?

No objection on the name.
But the whole patch looks strange.

> I am waiting for still some objections and then prepare v3

Please could you better state the problem you want to solve in the
messages of each v3 patch?
I'll try to understand and review the v3.

Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-23 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-02  8:58 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] app/testpmd: improve multiprocess support Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-02  8:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] librte_ether: ensure not overwrite device data in mp app Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-11 12:23   ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-09-20 14:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] app/testpmd: improve multiprocess support Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-20 14:31   ` Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-20 14:31     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] librte_ether: ensure not overwrite device data in mp app Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-20 16:14       ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-09-22 14:11         ` Kerlin, MarcinX
2016-09-23 14:12           ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-09-26 15:07             ` Kerlin, MarcinX
2016-09-20 16:48       ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-09-22 14:21         ` Kerlin, MarcinX
2016-09-26 14:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] app/testpmd: improve multiprocess support Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-26 14:53         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] librte_ether: ensure not overwrite device data in mp app Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-27  3:06           ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-09-27 10:01             ` Kerlin, MarcinX
2016-09-27 10:29           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] app/testpmd: improve multiprocess support Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-27 11:13           ` Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-27 11:13             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] librte_ether: add protection against overwrite device data Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-28 11:00               ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-09-28 14:03               ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-09-29 13:41                 ` Kerlin, MarcinX
2016-09-30 14:00               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] app/testpmd: improve multiprocess support Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-30 14:00                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] librte_ether: add protection against overwrite device data Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-30 15:00                   ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-10-06  9:41                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-06 13:57                     ` Kerlin, MarcinX
2016-10-06 14:20                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-06 14:52                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-07 12:23                     ` Kerlin, MarcinX
2016-10-11  8:52                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-09-30 14:24                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] app/testpmd: improve handling of multiprocess Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-30 15:02                   ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-09-30 15:03                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] app/testpmd: improve multiprocess support Pattan, Reshma
2016-10-18  7:57                 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-09-27 11:13             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] app/testpmd: improve handling of multiprocess Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-28 10:57               ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-09-28 11:34                 ` Kerlin, MarcinX
2016-09-28 12:08                   ` Pattan, Reshma
2016-09-26 14:53         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-20 14:31     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Marcin Kerlin
2016-09-02  8:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Marcin Kerlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4580114.oiHn6CQCKM@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=marcinx.kerlin@intel.com \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).