From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F0642C99; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 20:02:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF031410FD; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 20:02:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC1540698; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 20:02:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E3E5C006E; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:02:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:02:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1686592925; x=1686679325; bh=tyYfiWfJUs0DcrC940tuEe3oOs8qznlkuzA Uo17ehjI=; b=qtv5z6P+T+Nw9NqQhE4U+Gp8Fk+nAbCF1+oVxHDfUezY8ZS6rIv /lez/eRmuCUqvQ6cLVQ5Zm2Ql7kUJyXWF+DKQbptZUfpkU3ucyPdoYZQJNQ5euHZ HSUMsLAgZA36xmRGeMRu+DM8roqYpRrWndzzoh1fRgfv+d+d3hRsFYG2mldK/yaN 6wVnx8tbuvF/yp7Qorbx53U5IiB3n9nh1eUVTIjXCJACbuYN8aIM+TlTiRgQN/on VBqXglINbTTVvPL3GlUM/9NcgAqGb5bFUAY4SdTF11bVjX69i2RFyDXSaPEqbmpm y0G2ML3l3bZnCxA4lSPKmBu/5YzWDs9AWVg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1686592925; x=1686679325; bh=tyYfiWfJUs0DcrC940tuEe3oOs8qznlkuzA Uo17ehjI=; b=oahzjdTq2vCgdaB21FFPUVWJ/cMBj2YdonH2YwbLjLAVVnoCon2 f3XsMKQTz4rpYrGjd/oerZiy0DRG4zqKFAhJlBJqJNcQhgFtG/w8p+CUZbnosIit 8e2qx7QS3hG8ZmH/a3ZpNUyHc8vrJeNFFUWTuvJicte+06s0AG1aecb2528ZTvyq 1CE77aAeXywaNa73hBAJ5vvjSfqDTUnAeN/mFcNPtfuZqOA35g0H3nM5F3CAUHo9 FBO61SRsk6kgPUQ1E+MyQ4z/WGFjlROz1peL9/k+sJTBNY2mpiOQ6qyyNvJAoE+2 iSa8AYyMDrfzTsYFsg0M4lqtYML9lxxEovQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrgeduhedguddulecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhho mhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdejieeifeehtdffgfdvleetueeffeehueejgfeuteeftddt ieekgfekudehtdfgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:02:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Zhang, Qi Z" Cc: "Lu, Wenzhuo" , mschmidt , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Richardson, Bruce" , Konstantin Ananyev , "Wu, Jingjing" , "Xing, Beilei" , "Rong, Leyi" , "stable@dpdk.org" , helin.zhang@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/iavf: fix VLAN offload with AVX512 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 20:02:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4584961.CvnuH1ECHv@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20230327100750.448859-1-mschmidt@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 03/04/2023 07:39, Zhang, Qi Z: > > > It has been observed that mbufs of some received VLAN packets had the > > > VLAN tag correctly set in vlan_tci, but ol_flags were missing the > > > VLAN-indicating flags. > > > > > > _mm256_shuffle_epi8 operates as two independent 128-bit operations, > > > not as a single 256-bit operation. To have the RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN* > > > flags reflected in the resulting vlan_flags for all 8 rx descriptors, > > > the input l2tag2_flags_shuf must contain the required pattern in both 128- > > bit halves. > > > > > > This fix is for the AVX512 Rx path. The same bug in AVX2 was fixed by > > > commit > > > eb24917428a1 ("net/iavf: fix VLAN offload with AVX2"). > > > > > > Fixes: 4b64ccb328c9 ("net/iavf: fix VLAN extraction in AVX512 path") > > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt > > Acked-by: Wenzhuo Lu > > Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. I don't find this patch in your tree. Is it lost somewhere?