DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix static build link ordering
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:12:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45b10ccc-d9f8-c762-3590-c9997319def0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170113160124.GA17956@localhost.localdomain>

On 1/13/2017 4:01 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 03:57:59PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 1/13/2017 3:53 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 2017-01-13 08:51, Jerin Jacob:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:27:30PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>>>> On 1/12/2017 1:58 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:26:08AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>>>>>> 2017-01-12 13:16, Jerin Jacob:
>>>>>>>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB),y)
>>>>>>>>  _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD) += -lrte_pmd_ixgbe
>>>>>>>> +endif
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _LDLIBS is an internal variable of rte.app.mk.
>>>>>>> Please could you check that there is no issue when using LDLIBS instead
>>>>>>> of _LDLIBS?
>>>>>>
>>>> LDLIBS is not helping the situation as LDLIBS comes before the _LDLIBS-y
>>>> mk/rte.app.mk:LDLIBS += $(_LDLIBS-y) $(CPU_LDLIBS) $(EXTRA_LDLIBS)
>>>>
>>>> But moving to EXTRA_LDLIBS looks OK.But it has to be under CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD
>>>>
>>>> Thomas, Ferruh
>>>> Let me know if you have any objection on below mentioned diff
>>>>
>>>> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB),y)
>>>> -_LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD) += -lrte_pmd_ixgbe
>>>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD),y)
>>>> +EXTRA_LDLIBS += -lrte_pmd_ixgbe
>>>>  endif
>>>
>>> You need to keep the shared lib check.
>>> Anyway, EXTRA_LDLIBS should be reserved to users and not used in a Makefile.
>>> I prefer your initial patch using _LDLIBS.
>>>
>>> Any objection to merge initial proposal?
>>>
>>
>> LDLIBS should be OK, as long as wrapped with SHARED check. Is following
>> not working:
> 
> No, due to the following line
> mk/rte.app.mk:LDLIBS += $(_LDLIBS-y) $(CPU_LDLIBS) $(EXTRA_LDLIBS)
> 
> Again -lrte_pmd_ixgbe comes first.

You are right.

No objection to initial proposal.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-13 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-12  7:46 Jerin Jacob
2017-01-12  9:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-12 13:58   ` Jerin Jacob
2017-01-12 15:27     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-13  3:21       ` Jerin Jacob
2017-01-13 15:53         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-13 15:57           ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-13 16:01             ` Jerin Jacob
2017-01-13 16:12               ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-01-31 10:58                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-13 16:02           ` Jerin Jacob
2017-01-13 16:31 ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45b10ccc-d9f8-c762-3590-c9997319def0@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).