From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C08A04B1;
Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:47:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAF91C133;
Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:47:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31])
by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713ED1C12A;
Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:47:46 +0200 (CEST)
IronPort-SDR: ZHv/gpfJdBC5bea5bxh+fGPe4ZC+xVLQ5DqR550r7SYscpP05ICouBqAAG/FWsLu6ub4zwWYJp
YKC2OfJDNa1g==
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9725"; a="218001917"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,359,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="218001917"
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
27 Aug 2020 02:47:45 -0700
IronPort-SDR: VmZDTfRBKG+5z3lXw9gffwubciaQTdy/qDGdQWYwY4MzE9ikC9zmvWVIEUBwGwrBK48S7rWb/8
AE4xU0Z4d9Cg==
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,359,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="337117791"
Received: from lnorton-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.242.200])
([10.213.242.200])
by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2020 02:47:43 -0700
To: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>, Shougang Wang
<shougangx.wang@intel.com>, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"Chen, BoX C" <box.c.chen@intel.com>
References: <20200818181222.8462-1-bluca@debian.org>
<BN6PR11MB1667C607831D93AD9B99072ED9540@BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
<5e4efca917b88a9f6983229369547a1f410a110b.camel@debian.org>
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Message-ID: <45bd96a0-b8d6-ea77-68ea-1a2d6f016051@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:47:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5e4efca917b88a9f6983229369547a1f410a110b.camel@debian.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.4 patches review and test
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
On 26-Aug-20 10:50 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 02:30 +0000, Chen, BoX C wrote:
>> Hi Luca,
>> Update LTS 19.11.4 test result for Intel part. No new issue is found except known issues.
>
> Thank you!
>
>> * Intel(R) Testing
>>
>> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
>> * PF(i40e):Passed
>> - Exception message when starting testpmd for testing external memory. It has been fixed on 20.05.patch link: http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/66041/
>
> Anatoly, is it safe to backport this patch to 19.11? It applies and
> builds cleanly when cherry-picked:
>
> d1c7c0cdf7ba ("vfio: map contiguous areas in one go")
Hi Luca,
Yes, it should be safe - at least i'm not aware of any breakages ever
being reported so far. Thanks!
--
Thanks,
Anatoly