From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1061845ED8;
	Wed, 18 Dec 2024 09:59:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76F34066E;
	Wed, 18 Dec 2024 09:59:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B17402AE
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 09:59:16 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
 s=mimecast20190719; t=1734512355;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt;
 bh=G4QhL3theB4CdKAoBheag+E9lzySy/JPFFxj25WkzIk=;
 b=Dknsjx47kGZfYdU5XHZl1TTc6cizEyczy74wyi3mVgChmxG0sfKXbSLfcVN+sGck79u+TZ
 oRM5tZIo6/pUMMoqnugGQHoT8o2ESxmM6mWsllk+H9rErfAW2lP8L1xi2vgCstjMK5/kze
 fsYp6V99lBCswV+/Ugvl9LN2oIX5zgc=
Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com
 (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by
 relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3,
 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-655-8HEvg4RhMNK5dC6ec5JC9g-1; Wed,
 18 Dec 2024 03:59:12 -0500
X-MC-Unique: 8HEvg4RhMNK5dC6ec5JC9g-1
X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 8HEvg4RhMNK5dC6ec5JC9g
Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com
 (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS
 id EA07619560A3; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:59:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.39.208.31] (unknown [10.39.208.31])
 by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS
 id 4B95B1956053; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:59:07 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4649ed66-274a-483c-9241-59ba3a40c820@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 09:59:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/virtio: fix Rx checksum calculation
To: "Wangyunjian(wangyunjian,TongTu)" <wangyunjian@huawei.com>,
 "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
 Maxime Gouin <maxime.gouin@6wind.com>,
 "Lilijun (Jerry)" <jerry.lilijun@huawei.com>,
 wangzengyuan <wangzengyuan@huawei.com>, "xiawei (H)" <xiawei40@huawei.com>
References: <20241217153253.457646-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
 <8fdd9fc017f64ed088932d66119edc38@huawei.com>
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Autocrypt: addr=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com; keydata=
 xsFNBFOEQQIBEADjNLYZZqghYuWv1nlLisptPJp+TSxE/KuP7x47e1Gr5/oMDJ1OKNG8rlNg
 kLgBQUki3voWhUbMb69ybqdMUHOl21DGCj0BTU3lXwapYXOAnsh8q6RRM+deUpasyT+Jvf3a
 gU35dgZcomRh5HPmKMU4KfeA38cVUebsFec1HuJAWzOb/UdtQkYyZR4rbzw8SbsOemtMtwOx
 YdXodneQD7KuRU9IhJKiEfipwqk2pufm2VSGl570l5ANyWMA/XADNhcEXhpkZ1Iwj3TWO7XR
 uH4xfvPl8nBsLo/EbEI7fbuUULcAnHfowQslPUm6/yaGv6cT5160SPXT1t8U9QDO6aTSo59N
 jH519JS8oeKZB1n1eLDslCfBpIpWkW8ZElGkOGWAN0vmpLfdyiqBNNyS3eGAfMkJ6b1A24un
 /TKc6j2QxM0QK4yZGfAxDxtvDv9LFXec8ENJYsbiR6WHRHq7wXl/n8guyh5AuBNQ3LIK44x0
 KjGXP1FJkUhUuruGyZsMrDLBRHYi+hhDAgRjqHgoXi5XGETA1PAiNBNnQwMf5aubt+mE2Q5r
 qLNTgwSo2dpTU3+mJ3y3KlsIfoaxYI7XNsPRXGnZi4hbxmeb2NSXgdCXhX3nELUNYm4ArKBP
 LugOIT/zRwk0H0+RVwL2zHdMO1Tht1UOFGfOZpvuBF60jhMzbQARAQABzSxNYXhpbWUgQ29x
 dWVsaW4gPG1heGltZS5jb3F1ZWxpbkByZWRoYXQuY29tPsLBeAQTAQIAIgUCV3u/5QIbAwYL
 CQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQyjiNKEaHD4ma2g/+P+Hg9WkONPaY1J4AR7Uf
 kBneosS4NO3CRy0x4WYmUSLYMLx1I3VH6SVjqZ6uBoYy6Fs6TbF6SHNc7QbB6Qjo3neqnQR1
 71Ua1MFvIob8vUEl3jAR/+oaE1UJKrxjWztpppQTukIk4oJOmXbL0nj3d8dA2QgHdTyttZ1H
 xzZJWWz6vqxCrUqHU7RSH9iWg9R2iuTzii4/vk1oi4Qz7y/q8ONOq6ffOy/t5xSZOMtZCspu
 Mll2Szzpc/trFO0pLH4LZZfz/nXh2uuUbk8qRIJBIjZH3ZQfACffgfNefLe2PxMqJZ8mFJXc
 RQO0ONZvwoOoHL6CcnFZp2i0P5ddduzwPdGsPq1bnIXnZqJSl3dUfh3xG5ArkliZ/++zGF1O
 wvpGvpIuOgLqjyCNNRoR7cP7y8F24gWE/HqJBXs1qzdj/5Hr68NVPV1Tu/l2D1KMOcL5sOrz
 2jLXauqDWn1Okk9hkXAP7+0Cmi6QwAPuBT3i6t2e8UdtMtCE4sLesWS/XohnSFFscZR6Vaf3
 gKdWiJ/fW64L6b9gjkWtHd4jAJBAIAx1JM6xcA1xMbAFsD8gA2oDBWogHGYcScY/4riDNKXi
 lw92d6IEHnSf6y7KJCKq8F+Jrj2BwRJiFKTJ6ChbOpyyR6nGTckzsLgday2KxBIyuh4w+hMq
 TGDSp2rmWGJjASrOwU0EVPSbkwEQAMkaNc084Qvql+XW+wcUIY+Dn9A2D1gMr2BVwdSfVDN7
 0ZYxo9PvSkzh6eQmnZNQtl8WSHl3VG3IEDQzsMQ2ftZn2sxjcCadexrQQv3Lu60Tgj7YVYRM
 H+fLYt9W5YuWduJ+FPLbjIKynBf6JCRMWr75QAOhhhaI0tsie3eDsKQBA0w7WCuPiZiheJaL
 4MDe9hcH4rM3ybnRW7K2dLszWNhHVoYSFlZGYh+MGpuODeQKDS035+4H2rEWgg+iaOwqD7bg
 CQXwTZ1kSrm8NxIRVD3MBtzp9SZdUHLfmBl/tLVwDSZvHZhhvJHC6Lj6VL4jPXF5K2+Nn/Su
 CQmEBisOmwnXZhhu8ulAZ7S2tcl94DCo60ReheDoPBU8PR2TLg8rS5f9w6mLYarvQWL7cDtT
 d2eX3Z6TggfNINr/RTFrrAd7NHl5h3OnlXj7PQ1f0kfufduOeCQddJN4gsQfxo/qvWVB7PaE
 1WTIggPmWS+Xxijk7xG6x9McTdmGhYaPZBpAxewK8ypl5+yubVsE9yOOhKMVo9DoVCjh5To5
 aph7CQWfQsV7cd9PfSJjI2lXI0dhEXhQ7lRCFpf3V3mD6CyrhpcJpV6XVGjxJvGUale7+IOp
 sQIbPKUHpB2F+ZUPWds9yyVxGwDxD8WLqKKy0WLIjkkSsOb9UBNzgRyzrEC9lgQ/ABEBAAHC
 wV8EGAECAAkFAlT0m5MCGwwACgkQyjiNKEaHD4nU8hAAtt0xFJAy0sOWqSmyxTc7FUcX+pbD
 KVyPlpl6urKKMk1XtVMUPuae/+UwvIt0urk1mXi6DnrAN50TmQqvdjcPTQ6uoZ8zjgGeASZg
 jj0/bJGhgUr9U7oG7Hh2F8vzpOqZrdd65MRkxmc7bWj1k81tOU2woR/Gy8xLzi0k0KUa8ueB
 iYOcZcIGTcs9CssVwQjYaXRoeT65LJnTxYZif2pfNxfINFzCGw42s3EtZFteczClKcVSJ1+L
 +QUY/J24x0/ocQX/M1PwtZbB4c/2Pg/t5FS+s6UB1Ce08xsJDcwyOPIH6O3tccZuriHgvqKP
 yKz/Ble76+NFlTK1mpUlfM7PVhD5XzrDUEHWRTeTJSvJ8TIPL4uyfzhjHhlkCU0mw7Pscyxn
 DE8G0UYMEaNgaZap8dcGMYH/96EfE5s/nTX0M6MXV0yots7U2BDb4soLCxLOJz4tAFDtNFtA
 wLBhXRSvWhdBJZiig/9CG3dXmKfi2H+wdUCSvEFHRpgo7GK8/Kh3vGhgKmnnxhl8ACBaGy9n
 fxjSxjSO6rj4/MeenmlJw1yebzkX8ZmaSi8BHe+n6jTGEFNrbiOdWpJgc5yHIZZnwXaW54QT
 UhhSjDL1rV2B4F28w30jYmlRmm2RdN7iCZfbyP3dvFQTzQ4ySquuPkIGcOOHrvZzxbRjzMx1
 Mwqu3GQ=
In-Reply-To: <8fdd9fc017f64ed088932d66119edc38@huawei.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: -TW2dGrgzR5ClgDSW0i2RHl7S3vor4-7eDK1Jq-Etbk_1734512351
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

Hi,

On 12/18/24 08:34, Wangyunjian(wangyunjian,TongTu) wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 11:33 PM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>; Maxime Gouin
>> <maxime.gouin@6wind.com>; Maxime Coquelin
>> <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH] net/virtio: fix Rx checksum calculation
>>
>> From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
>>
>> If hdr->csum_start is larger than packet length, the len argument passed
>> to rte_raw_cksum_mbuf() overflows and causes a segmentation fault.
>>
>> Ignore checksum computation in this case.
>>
>> CVE-2024-11614
>>
>> Fixes: ca7036b4af3a ("vhost: fix offload flags in Rx path")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Gouin <maxime.gouin@6wind.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   lib/vhost/virtio_net.c | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/vhost/virtio_net.c b/lib/vhost/virtio_net.c
>> index d764d4bc6a..69901ab3b5 100644
>> --- a/lib/vhost/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/lib/vhost/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -2823,6 +2823,9 @@ vhost_dequeue_offload(struct virtio_net *dev,
>> struct virtio_net_hdr *hdr,
>>   			 */
>>   			uint16_t csum = 0, off;
>>
>> +			if (hdr->csum_start >= rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(m))
>> +				return;
>> +
> 
> The hdr->csum_start does two successive reads from user space to read
> a variable length data structure. The result overflow if the data structure
> changes between the two reads.
> 
> We can prevent double fetch issue by using the temporary variable csum_start.

Right, that's a good catch! The exploitation od this issue seem
difficult though.

We may systematically copy the full header, as we only do it for ones
not contiguous in host VA space.

What do you think? Are you willing to contribute a fix?

Thanks,
Maxime
> 
> Thanks,
> Yunjian
> 
>>   			if (rte_raw_cksum_mbuf(m, hdr->csum_start,
>>   					rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(m) - hdr->csum_start, &csum) <
>> 0)
>>   				return;
>> --
>> 2.47.0
>