From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACF57E89 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:16:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n3so12598359wiv.17 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 04:24:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=YMkSK2ls1UEkaYQMbxeKceMwNyWwhNm3dkPvLAvDc5o=; b=Ichpt9jXfeHrobIGxayYBGAb+/2MX9O345UcdOnEpe53UC/RU2U5UkB2TzaVyFpLSG Nysi37CHWry0JPhLNSoSimpZ2gL7Hy26ivsjF7F8cF0/09jgG6Dg7BnaEJ+hH/q0lUsh ICjhvGjwOZXVxbEH2UIeZjkPbdxnNtAvFzJ7bdC3gzOhVdBQKYxwVv7v/VVmge0Zl7Jt 7fRBUuEb6b3Kd5Bqsu76S+4KEn9h696gICjyePfm8SbC9jRAUqCz0r1bwpzdom32gbXr UYSWAgUJtO4JWQTJfhn0EpU+mmgq61LjtlAJ+t522S5HOmtpt40Gkn/Xv3bVI3cqVsbz 2OUg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn9fhjDIStk2mQn+adQczpPWpshq/OvAmcCeo1wKMRmMBsdsokIifQlpvGCBaNBK2kDPm/A X-Received: by 10.194.87.168 with SMTP id az8mr11777560wjb.65.1413372240029; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 04:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k10sm23541738wjb.28.2014.10.15.04.23.58 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 04:23:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Dey, Souvik" Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:23:43 +0200 Message-ID: <471124659.68G021lYDz@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.1; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4B8F36DD0FB25E47B3DA6F493BF591B70DC5972B@inba-mail02.sonusnet.com> References: <4B8F36DD0FB25E47B3DA6F493BF591B70DC5972B@inba-mail02.sonusnet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Patil, PraveenKumar" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] FW: BUG in IP FRAGMENTATION X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:16:11 -0000 ME TOO, I HAVE A BUG WITH CAPS LOCK ;) 2014-10-15 11:06, Dey, Souvik: > In DPDK1.6 do we support overlapped fragments while doing reassembly. > Also why we don't consider the first or last fragment to be out-of-order. > Are this known limitations in DPDK or they are not working due to some > bugs in the code ? Please test the latest version and explain how you see the bug. Thanks -- Thomas