From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10BAA04E7; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 21:28:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0367F66DA; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 21:28:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FBA5B3C for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 21:28:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75725C0144; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 15:28:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 Nov 2020 15:28:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= 7TTwi+n76htuYMnZMgQeufWorR56WgGbd1yTC+t7QtU=; b=RwDqeP45FziWcqNw WTM1YudSb++xO7HvQSNb2QI6TQzi6jc95lne4BxxBQdlJaMkA23CwEeZSMsTA6dk a1cvI+OcH4BfT1CnLPcFkKVLpCIiAHuWGiUCLkXPEjKumHilcRTAj3zifH4g6Pwm a+S+0rr2j7HwJ2I2GOwk5KhmzsQXE4cKk7Jr25BE4CfpUt0ys8jaiCV959hxCl8O 0VM2vX6syMExKV0pXp8qCaQMGVe3mlJAsmo6sSx/kkpw+nm0X1CzxatuPfT/2zgi RLPaXP23QBQ+SC4AX3LmKkA5Izawg17VH44bRLHBrt/Y/dVMyUkmA9Obcu00PW93 g0gEQQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=7TTwi+n76htuYMnZMgQeufWorR56WgGbd1yTC+t7Q tU=; b=Kkwab7Nv26lyKhCqBAeY2WxSR+XHqDPeCqBcbwzwH4GZP9+rFusZ8gq1C ykOMER1AWAqQs3u7CB43kILpZVnA6JPkrLvmCoR1EARrn5XhYiWKX/OSKt5Jreyt xUG0OcGGRquzw9SW/VoegJ9y1L2C0GdOIyMcCtWepVF+ENIkA5h+1sEiwUSy5k93 vCyN36XJTQdTlyeZrGW6T8VEJ2m4l+ju8D8dEnrqmCroZaJ72FMI7RimeH5U/dCQ T44/bOrG3CNde4CZZ69iekUp9jAR3MxNJjGVnMwrBroPGcg4Vo2VTpo9NCKoYCm4 RT4H1nLa14KGM8a3spwIdd7weFcNA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedruddtfedgudefiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgr lhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AB2F83064686; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 15:28:23 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Pallavi Kadam Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ranjit.menon@intel.com, dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com, Narcisa.Vasile@microsoft.com, talshn@nvidia.com, "Burakov, Anatoly" Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 21:28:22 +0100 Message-ID: <4776239.YslOQH0Lb5@thomas> In-Reply-To: <8a3139b8-3a03-1f98-69c1-e3c38fb5fa4d@intel.com> References: <20201021202616.2732-1-pallavi.kadam@intel.com> <20201026184458.8492-1-pallavi.kadam@intel.com> <8a3139b8-3a03-1f98-69c1-e3c38fb5fa4d@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: enable windows apps to run on non-admin users X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 28/10/2020 13:41, Burakov, Anatoly: > On 26-Oct-20 6:44 PM, Pallavi Kadam wrote: > > Currently, since there is no runtime directory set, the code tries to > > create a file in C:\ which is only writable with administrator > > privileges. As a result, if the user is not admin, the application will > > fail. > > So, forcing no_shconf to 1 to prevent the code having to create files in > > the runtime directory. > > > > Suggested-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk > > Signed-off-by: Pallavi Kadam > > Reviewed-by: Ranjit Menon > > --- > > internal_conf->in_memory = 1; > > + internal_conf->no_shconf = 1; > > This is the correct way, as in-memory implies no_shconf. I would like to > deprecate noshconf option as it's a subset of what in-memory does. > > Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov Applied, thanks