DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Sebastian, Selwin" <Selwin.Sebastian@amd.com>,
	"Namburu, Chandu-babu" <chandu@amd.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "Arsalan_Awan@mentor.com" <Arsalan_Awan@mentor.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/axgbe: use PCI root complex device to distinguish AMD hardware
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 10:22:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47b71ae3-0729-d7aa-0394-908700ec0b34@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR12MB505545AFA73DC6EDA2346ADC8D579@DM4PR12MB5055.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

On 1/17/2022 5:40 AM, Sebastian, Selwin wrote:
> Acked by: Selwin Sebastian <selwin.sebastian@amd.com>
> 

Hi Selwin,

Patchwork doesn't recognize the tag, I guess because it is looking for
exact "Acked-by: " tag, with '-'.

Can you please pay attention next time, able to see the status in the patchwork
help maintainers to trace patch's status.

Cheers,
ferruh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Namburu, Chandu-babu <chandu@amd.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 12:08 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; david.marchand@redhat.com; ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> Cc: Sebastian, Selwin <Selwin.Sebastian@amd.com>; Arsalan_Awan@mentor.com; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] net/axgbe: use PCI root complex device to distinguish AMD hardware
> 
> [Public]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Gentle reminder.
> 
> This is patch is required to submit changes for new AMD products. Please review and let us know if any modification are required.
> 
> Regards,
> Chandu
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Namburu, Chandu-babu
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2021 2:58 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; david.marchand@redhat.com; ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> Cc: Sebastian, Selwin <Selwin.Sebastian@amd.com>; Arsalan_Awan@mentor.com; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] net/axgbe: use PCI root complex device to distinguish AMD hardware
> 
> [Public]
> 
> Hi David Marchand,
> 
> I have submitted v2 patch with your suggestion in git log. Please review changes.
> 
> Regards,
> Chandu
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Namburu, Chandu-babu <chandu@amd.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 9:41 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; david.marchand@redhat.com
> Cc: Sebastian, Selwin <Selwin.Sebastian@amd.com>; Arsalan_Awan@mentor.com; ferruh.yigit@intel.com; Namburu, Chandu-babu <chandu@amd.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2] net/axgbe: use PCI root complex device to distinguish AMD hardware
> 
> "bus/pci: optimize bus scan" broke axgbe on V1000/R1000.
> RV root complex pci device does not have any kernel driver assigned so it is removed from pci scan list which is used in
> "net/axgbe: add a HW quirk for register definitions".
> 
> Get root complex device id directly from pci sysfs instead of pci scan list.
> 
> Fixes: 991e0b1dbc4a (net/axgbe: add a HW quirk for register definitions)
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chandubabu Namburu <chandu@amd.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c
> index 7d40c18a86..7b8d94ca3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/axgbe/axgbe_ethdev.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>   #include "axgbe_regs.h"
>   #include "rte_time.h"
>   
> +#include "eal_filesystem.h"
> +
>   static int eth_axgbe_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev);  static int  axgbe_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);  static int  axgbe_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev); @@ -2117,28 +2119,27 @@ static void axgbe_default_config(struct axgbe_port *pdata)
>   	pdata->power_down = 0;
>   }
>   
> -static int
> -pci_device_cmp(const struct rte_device *dev, const void *_pci_id)
> +/*
> + * Return PCI root complex device id on success else 0  */ static
> +uint16_t
> +get_pci_rc_devid(void)
>   {
> -	const struct rte_pci_device *pdev = RTE_DEV_TO_PCI_CONST(dev);
> -	const struct rte_pci_id *pcid = _pci_id;
> +	char pci_sysfs[PATH_MAX];
> +	const struct rte_pci_addr pci_rc_addr = {0, 0, 0, 0};
> +	unsigned long device_id;
>   
> -	if (pdev->id.vendor_id == AMD_PCI_VENDOR_ID &&
> -			pdev->id.device_id == pcid->device_id)
> -		return 0;
> -	return 1;
> -}
> +	snprintf(pci_sysfs, sizeof(pci_sysfs), "%s/" PCI_PRI_FMT "/device",
> +		 rte_pci_get_sysfs_path(), pci_rc_addr.domain,
> +		 pci_rc_addr.bus, pci_rc_addr.devid, pci_rc_addr.function);
>   
> -static bool
> -pci_search_device(int device_id)
> -{
> -	struct rte_bus *pci_bus;
> -	struct rte_pci_id dev_id;
> +	/* get device id */
> +	if (eal_parse_sysfs_value(pci_sysfs, &device_id) < 0) {
> +		PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Error in reading PCI sysfs\n");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>   
> -	dev_id.device_id = device_id;
> -	pci_bus = rte_bus_find_by_name("pci");
> -	return (pci_bus != NULL) &&
> -		(pci_bus->find_device(NULL, pci_device_cmp, &dev_id) != NULL);
> +	return (uint16_t)device_id;
>   }
>   
>   /*
> @@ -2180,7 +2181,7 @@ eth_axgbe_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>   	/*
>   	 * Use root complex device ID to differentiate RV AXGBE vs SNOWY AXGBE
>   	 */
> -	if (pci_search_device(AMD_PCI_RV_ROOT_COMPLEX_ID)) {
> +	if ((get_pci_rc_devid()) == AMD_PCI_RV_ROOT_COMPLEX_ID) {
>   		pdata->xpcs_window_def_reg = PCS_V2_RV_WINDOW_DEF;
>   		pdata->xpcs_window_sel_reg = PCS_V2_RV_WINDOW_SELECT;
>   	} else {
> --
> 2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-17 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-26 10:24 [PATCH v1] " Chandubabu Namburu
2021-12-01  8:45 ` Awan, Arsalan
2021-12-01  9:00 ` David Marchand
2021-12-02  5:53   ` Namburu, Chandu-babu
2021-12-02 16:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Chandubabu Namburu
2021-12-22  9:27   ` Namburu, Chandu-babu
2022-01-10  6:38     ` Namburu, Chandu-babu
2022-01-17  5:40       ` Sebastian, Selwin
2022-01-17 10:22         ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2022-01-17 10:30           ` Sebastian, Selwin
2022-01-17 10:29         ` Sebastian, Selwin
2022-01-17 14:07           ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47b71ae3-0729-d7aa-0394-908700ec0b34@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=Arsalan_Awan@mentor.com \
    --cc=Selwin.Sebastian@amd.com \
    --cc=chandu@amd.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).