From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7867A00C2; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:28:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F32242B9F; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:28:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC6B242B97 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:28:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6F25C00A7; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 04:28:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 04:28:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= nU6CAhpardnNWSuxCiEaObs63tKom7TcVtDuwQPq3Z0=; b=iz4mAWncPUJXa4Nt jRyOw7ejx7rNChPmNPN5TxSOE7DAkYOcPC7vegO+1jPpLkBVTZz92BZ0yj+MFRSA c6LMoAbd4e5L4IV1X6gCb/UutDBmjZFai//k2LqwqnQVvPQdV6Ea+yJhfoK1dtc+ 3YNnVV8hNcQTJyTyQFYiGIumHmKuWt0Va8VBpWbRdxnRYR+UJD6IGwqZ4gGsQPpR m0g6DqU/8+I51puQP1dSoPgm8loErhmTBMIz/0mzKCjK4F9AJFKa/Vt3hd6sD8FX 4ewgnL2rlNrK3MkG1kczYklNgF/YkgI75J4U5Mysa/SY6xctbfDTDxnNQFPZYuqV 3izZGg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=nU6CAhpardnNWSuxCiEaObs63tKom7TcVtDuwQPq3 Z0=; b=uATIhWMTFw9loLd1weTPgKc4aARdmIFOa9tABInQ2gh9D5o37gd2E0egq ha7+ak6HPdgeLAvVFiDKNokZjnLfE+c2z5sFgvrcKm28ONUIRGnF2TNZLFMAi74G w1xtJ5JqhZoB8HPzc0kiFiQjAUxBSojU/7lYt+PZBLnom9bnZFo+knCCvNo6GKDe dZcwVc8wXfOBFkMNB0HLph0BEGIoUI/qi7goht3kAi7PYuZ5Cid/vUO+F30sxnWL ST5bG262GDgmmSne0Jvci1smpKEu+BCYl1MeEsTX08dEgBMP1ysjIZipe3hd/I/v KiCj1xw125Z7t1t7wZorJ9ROsGV4A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeffedguddujecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgr lhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0FDE11080054; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 04:28:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bing Zhao Cc: orika@nvidia.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:28:33 +0100 Message-ID: <4868470.BFrr8Tzbyp@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1615967952-228321-1-git-send-email-bingz@nvidia.com> References: <1615967952-228321-1-git-send-email-bingz@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: introduce action context APIs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 17/03/2021 08:59, Bing Zhao: > The new functions rte_flow_action_ctx* that were added will replace > the curret shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*. > - rte_flow_shared_action_create > - rte_flow_shared_action_destroy > - rte_flow_shared_action_update > - rte_flow_shared_action_query > + rte_flow_action_ctx_create > + rte_flow_action_ctx_destroy > + rte_flow_action_ctx_update > + rte_flow_action_ctx_query > > When creating a action context, it could be shared among different > flows or different ports. Or it could also be used by a single flow. > The name "shared" is improper in a sense. Is it the only reason for the change? I better understand "shared" even if it is sometimes not shared.