From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>, Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] usertools: rewrite pmdinfo
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 18:44:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4903382.atdPhlSkOF@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CNK36G07WE6K.W07YLNHHCL5G@marty>
12/10/2022 18:30, Robin Jarry:
> Thomas Monjalon, Oct 12, 2022 at 18:16:
> > What about implementing both?
> > If ldd is available, use it,
> > otherwise use LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS variable.
>
> This is a bit overkill in my opinion. Also it would make the behaviour
> somewhat different whether ldd is available and/or the analyzed binaries
> are executable.
Yes, different behaviour is not desirable.
> I think it is an OK limitation to require that the analyzed ELF files
> are executable.
>
> By the way, the following command:
>
> LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 build/app/dpdk-test-pmd
>
> Works both on Linux and FreeBSD and produces similar outputs.
OK for executable,
but can we expect .so to be always executable?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-12 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-13 10:58 [PATCH] " Robin Jarry
2022-09-13 11:29 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-13 11:49 ` Robin Jarry
2022-09-13 13:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-13 13:59 ` Robin Jarry
2022-09-13 14:17 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-13 14:17 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-09-13 19:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Robin Jarry
2022-09-13 20:54 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-13 21:22 ` Robin Jarry
2022-09-14 11:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-15 9:18 ` Robin Jarry
2022-09-20 9:08 ` [PATCH v3] " Robin Jarry
2022-09-20 10:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-20 10:12 ` Robin Jarry
2022-09-20 10:42 ` [PATCH v4] " Robin Jarry
2022-09-20 14:08 ` Olivier Matz
2022-09-20 17:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-20 17:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-21 7:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-09-21 8:02 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-20 19:15 ` Robin Jarry
2022-09-21 7:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-21 9:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-22 11:58 ` [PATCH v5] " Robin Jarry
2022-09-22 12:03 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-09-22 15:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-09-26 11:55 ` Olivier Matz
2022-09-26 12:52 ` Robin Jarry
2022-09-26 13:44 ` [PATCH v6] " Robin Jarry
2022-09-26 15:17 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-09-28 6:51 ` Robin Jarry
2022-09-28 10:53 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-09-28 11:12 ` Robin Jarry
2022-10-04 19:29 ` [PATCH v7] " Robin Jarry
2022-10-10 22:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-12 15:16 ` Olivier Matz
2022-10-12 16:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-12 16:30 ` Robin Jarry
2022-10-12 16:44 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2022-10-12 16:48 ` Robin Jarry
2022-10-12 20:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4903382.atdPhlSkOF@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=rjarry@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).