From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6376DA0588; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:50:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF461DD2B; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:50:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB641DCBE for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:50:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9C55C02F2; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:50:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:50:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=lYQWYOr4aXYHsSlNPBrPglsggwslZYRjgVi8XYSTCWs=; b=JaPtB76ekZdr tB75DNVuiCf9PGBUMb/YD17IdWVksdZKLpf6l+nqYOv2OVmkC6feRv84CzWXe/tF W6jwVdNLwrlTlS/WaB0ec+XMXzv8Pl8jlfnjulgfb1okoIuNFsNsr4zDZ8Qd7ytu pR055P8MZaIj9Vw/cfNT9+ISON5y87c= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=lYQWYOr4aXYHsSlNPBrPglsggwslZYRjgVi8XYSTC Ws=; b=sUc3Bdt5qjS2tc5G84lwvk7my117bnexpPRC/RLFJLKyYLyEpgqdFtHfS f1imCLBS7RjIkIKFUEFGf47tc9GixBiaD8wlxhmm8b1Hi2bqSwX2h4oJxpOT6EAF OrmuUfLJzqu1ogv93wfdEq0edbYCboKhrNtPNYRJifOIPTyUUsgF5err1fw2rSX/ ULzaLK5y698qQBn6KY2jcxpUJrGkvyVl8iPcXIb7yZ3mwnDeLOZOrNtNHLp9R83d 8HuoRdcMSNCQufVrJ4g1pOp3UsTFWmWNgVxLA/qyDv44BgzLljAzi/B6EFAXs2cC AnStQAbVvH+PugIUmAy65zoZJrItA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrfeehgdekudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D7D563060069; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:50:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" Cc: dev@dpdk.org, yipeng1.wang@intel.com, sameh.gobriel@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 16:50:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4920882.VQhiAETyHQ@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <1586370739-61729-1-git-send-email-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com> <3563105.IFkqi6BYcA@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test: update hash performance tests X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 16/04/2020 16:47, Medvedkin, Vladimir: > Hi Thomas, > > On 16/04/2020 10:44, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 08/04/2020 20:32, Vladimir Medvedkin: > >> Add preformance test for rte_hash_lookup_with_hash_bulk_data() > > Why is it a separate patch? > > To me, it is natural to add such test when adding a new hash API. > > So they should be in the same patch. > > > > Here I split the patch to help review it - first lib part, second - test > part. I can merge it if you think it should be. Yes please. I don't think it helps reviewing because they are in different files anyway.