From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] eal: add new secure free function
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 10:01:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49539947-48de-415e-b968-776eab0f3797@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211173720.1188517-3-stephen@networkplumber.org>
On 2025/2/12 1:35, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Although internally rte_free does poison the buffer in most
> cases, it is useful to have function that explicitly does
> this to avoid any security issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> ---
> lib/eal/common/rte_malloc.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> lib/eal/include/rte_malloc.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> lib/eal/version.map | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/common/rte_malloc.c b/lib/eal/common/rte_malloc.c
> index 3eed4d4be6..c9e0f4724f 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/common/rte_malloc.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/common/rte_malloc.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <rte_eal_memconfig.h>
> #include <rte_common.h>
> #include <rte_spinlock.h>
> +#include <rte_string_fns.h>
>
> #include <eal_trace_internal.h>
>
> @@ -27,27 +28,44 @@
>
>
> /* Free the memory space back to heap */
> -static void
> -mem_free(void *addr, const bool trace_ena)
> +static inline void
> +mem_free(void *addr, const bool trace_ena, bool zero)
> {
> + struct malloc_elem *elem;
> +
> if (trace_ena)
> rte_eal_trace_mem_free(addr);
>
> - if (addr == NULL) return;
> - if (malloc_heap_free(malloc_elem_from_data(addr)) < 0)
> + if (addr == NULL)
> + return;
> +
> + elem = malloc_elem_from_data(addr);
> + if (zero) {
> + size_t data_len = elem->size - MALLOC_ELEM_OVERHEAD;
this will make rte_malloc know the layout of malloc-elem.
Prefer to add extra paramter, e.g. malloc_heap_free(elem, bool zero)
> +
> + rte_memset_sensitive(addr, 0, data_len);
> + }
> +
> + if (malloc_heap_free(elem) < 0)
> EAL_LOG(ERR, "Error: Invalid memory");
> }
>
> void
> rte_free(void *addr)
> {
> - mem_free(addr, true);
> + mem_free(addr, true, false);
> +}
> +
> +void
> +rte_free_sensitive(void *addr)
> +{
> + mem_free(addr, true, true);
> }
>
> void
> eal_free_no_trace(void *addr)
> {
> - mem_free(addr, false);
> + mem_free(addr, false, false);
> }
>
> static void *
> diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_malloc.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_malloc.h
> index c8836de67c..d472ebb7db 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/include/rte_malloc.h
> +++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_malloc.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,24 @@ struct rte_malloc_socket_stats {
> void
> rte_free(void *ptr);
>
> +
> +/**
> + * Frees the memory space pointed to by the provided pointer
> + * and guarantees it will be zero'd before reuse.
> + *
> + * This pointer must have been returned by a previous call to
> + * rte_malloc(), rte_zmalloc(), rte_calloc() or rte_realloc(). The behaviour of
> + * rte_free() is undefined if the pointer does not match this requirement.
Suggest add notice: The value may be cleared twice, which affects the performance.
> + *
> + * If the pointer is NULL, the function does nothing.
> + *
> + * @param ptr
> + * The pointer to memory to be freed.
> + */
> +__rte_experimental
> +void
> +rte_free_sensitive(void *ptr);
one line is OK.
void rte_free_sensitive(void *ptr);
> +
> /**
> * This function allocates memory from the huge-page area of memory. The memory
> * is not cleared. In NUMA systems, the memory allocated resides on the same
> diff --git a/lib/eal/version.map b/lib/eal/version.map
> index a20c713eb1..fa67ff44d5 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/version.map
> +++ b/lib/eal/version.map
> @@ -398,6 +398,9 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> # added in 24.11
> rte_bitset_to_str;
> rte_lcore_var_alloc;
> +
> + # added in 25.03
> + rte_free_sensitive;
> };
>
> INTERNAL {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-12 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-14 1:10 [PATCH 0/3] introduce rte_memset_sensative Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 1:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] eal: " Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 1:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] crypto/qat: use rte_memset_sensative Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 1:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] eal: add rte_free_sensative Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] memset security handling Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] eal: introduce new secure memory fill Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] eal: add new secure free function Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] crypto/qat: force zero of keys Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] crypto/qat: fix size calculation for memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] crypto/qat: use secure memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] bus/uacce: remove memset before free Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] compress/octeontx: remove unnecessary memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] test: remove unneeded memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] memset security handling Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] eal: introduce new secure memory fill Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] eal: add new secure free function Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] crypto/qat: force zero of keys Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] crypto/qat: fix size calculation for memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] crypto/qat: use secure memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] bus/uacce: remove memset before free Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] compress/octeontx: remove unnecessary memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] test: remove unneeded memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] net/ntnic: remove unnecessary void cast Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-17 18:16 ` Serhii Iliushyk
2024-11-14 2:35 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] net/ntnic: check result of malloc Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-17 18:24 ` Serhii Iliushyk
2024-11-14 2:36 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] net/ntnic: remove unnecessary memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-17 18:26 ` Serhii Iliushyk
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] memset security fixes Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] eal: introduce new secure memory fill Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] eal: add new secure free function Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] crypto/qat: force zero of keys Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] crypto/qat: fix size calculation for memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] crypto/qat: use secure memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] bus/uacce: remove memset before free Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-15 6:04 ` fengchengwen
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] compress/octeontx: remove unnecessary memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] test: remove unneeded memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] net/ntnic: remove unnecessary void cast Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] net/ntnic: check result of malloc Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] net/ntnic: remove unnecessary memset Stephen Hemminger
2024-11-14 18:43 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] devtools/cocci: add script to find problematic memset Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-11 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] memset security fixes Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-11 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] eal: introduce new secure memory fill Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-12 1:37 ` fengchengwen
2025-02-11 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] eal: add new secure free function Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-12 2:01 ` fengchengwen [this message]
2025-02-11 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] crypto/qat: force zero of keys Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-11 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] crypto/qat: fix size calculation for memset Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-11 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] crypto/qat: use secure memset Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-11 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] bus/uacce: remove memset before free Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-11 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] compress/octeontx: remove unnecessary memset Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-11 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] test: remove unneeded memset Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-12 1:40 ` fengchengwen
2025-02-11 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] net/ntnic: check result of malloc Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-11 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] net/ntnic: remove unnecessary memset Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-11 17:35 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] devtools/cocci: add script to find problematic memset Stephen Hemminger
2025-02-11 20:59 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] memset security fixes Patrick Robb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49539947-48de-415e-b968-776eab0f3797@huawei.com \
--to=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).