From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFE22A5D for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 23:38:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id c85so28128330wmi.1 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:38:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e1w12AVhkzbUttGZPnatj3F0VIl4aUGtJTRZzzDJnlo=; b=SvZG1qj25aKybyHaUyup6bNzCQuI+JTuqAQTxhQ9o8Vj+sJy/ivJVg/jLrUSinNGo6 n2g2dMKMpM8Nwj1fIahQbk/rsYtk2FA9/ofhgU+7GieeNbPSm2c1qUvRJ7UQxFsxKPcU N9oXC4XBEAzz1oHmF3p3O/QPU8ggW8FTUQXMlxMBNzQRrNsvAEBIH7xpNUWtnpsvnQ/6 8P6TnekPMaJSbYxNvsg9g/yy29fYvgrWVy7oQNpNJlBozo7RHgIms63WE83mqMH/3c4u K7xqEbW/kDD+EAVfuxyZ5BXLI0F173aFHxDedKuPwukY7JNoq2TnocZO0IcwR9uKUpFd MZwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e1w12AVhkzbUttGZPnatj3F0VIl4aUGtJTRZzzDJnlo=; b=k3CtKG6qnwe1uDGEq1r/K8eS/halWwSlwnhoqKTsNeG0tIc3pVqGAODY5nmxTpUi1H 5igCwG4obgbGM5ja28fynCFsmWxVk1EFLwVINcZzHJAy/2G9L0PJqn7sKnVgKtQyJop1 3qbxiTYTvJHsOKCntFdskK4s2L+03P8JKALFz4kjkKnyOovhQBKRqCZEPKYri1i9ZMQx wi2pmlgOlUEM50fnpQ50U62H39JlVrqCmr6YSdIZrnOnQf0c4RaDn2McpgpH3xtT3cH3 v5p4aW1ogJa6g/uW1f73Qc63592xPwesZxlEzCZiXQyLtLGF7s6lJYn/sOFpQaX6XiQk 6btw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39msy7ZZf5r9U7DMqePzmc+Z3ybJBqGHBadtqQZuFc8bllHvzxhWETF5bpufzIDEl1KK X-Received: by 10.28.191.208 with SMTP id o77mr3467568wmi.117.1487371082716; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:38:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r195sm3281736wme.25.2017.02.17.14.38.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:38:02 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Yong Wang Cc: Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org, John McNamara Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 23:37:56 +0100 Message-ID: <4966535.E9V4giOa3W@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20170131121819.32196-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <86596f35-f483-e493-101e-f93969bd2f1b@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9] net/kni: add KNI PMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 22:38:03 -0000 2017-02-17 17:52, Yong Wang: > From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com] > > On 2/17/2017 1:47 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 2017-02-17 13:42, Ferruh Yigit: > > >> Add KNI PMD which wraps librte_kni for ease of use. > > >> > > >> KNI PMD can be used as any regular PMD to send / receive packets to the > > >> Linux networking stack. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit > > >> Reviewed-by: Yong Wang > > >> --- > > I have the impression that Reviewed-by is good enough for a change to be accepted, which does not seem to be the case. > > Acked-by: Yong Wang Sorry, it is not what I meant. Your Reviewed-by is really strong to make confident the patch is good. But Ferruh wanted to make sure more people wants this PMD.