From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04326A0A05; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 22:30:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB9B140F92; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 22:27:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09350140F86 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 22:27:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4315E129A; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:27:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:27:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= mQ62YuWjlWknrnjq+U0cWfcE+AsqwLgPjqraOW1L4NM=; b=lnp+I5/7iaoUwUQc k5aiJ5AHXIeU3/YkJCYJw3yvP0NfLUEzfsSXXPwsrpv2ljc6DfJhQIESdsiiJRc2 f8u0kf0nB/Fr5aC2eFZlcPGMkhw7Tork766oeJwday3G7qBBGlRQLvuRI1pJurtZ HYR52LMIU20wiOuxCQShziQ0Z0BTGgKIFndo6feM1eQV59CfvPvO+5xWqVr89H93 gtJvQInYW60Yc32A2ofMg3GAfEBLVqCBvXErmilOM1JpEOXBTaEuTppbvMb3RYD/ eNVFnqoT2THsW2EW8asn6tnBDjHMVfUvmLCChbKO4P0M2frTRshmPSwG5cTbdqaO n3xadw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=mQ62YuWjlWknrnjq+U0cWfcE+AsqwLgPjqraOW1L4 NM=; b=OIRS+nQ+2jx5OfJdS0ZVGeZMLMhZjf9E+XHBTfePT9Z0X6X7IIkqLhnDC O/2wrmwbQ422q0Ky3CHGSiCEJbAkJwyWIolWc8LKJd+rAr3V61eFzwmeAURF6ugn PlAQHau/M7CIlfPJU7rM4rHEgrlnqJjQoPhRggWDowRvhM3ZBdrw/KDlyKS9a62e cHY6BJytv7V+wd5OotPDvM8hSpvo+xAAkUmDUeaa8DvUrjHY2bxg9eoL0z6Vk9a+ DNm5hPDqjnC92Tmyk8tDnvNgjQKY+C3lPVsB/mESiIrm+uyUzWetOWg531fjwpRc c/WjhJlLpz948mTNVp8NgMNXeYJDQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddtgdduhedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A04A824005D; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:27:54 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Lijun Ou , humin29@huawei.com, yisen.zhuang@huawei.com Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 22:27:52 +0100 Message-ID: <4970064.mIoEzGc4PQ@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1609904792-63280-2-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com> References: <1607846585-2381-1-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com> <1609904792-63280-1-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com> <1609904792-63280-2-git-send-email-oulijun@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] net/hns3: fix incorrect interception with filter director X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 06/01/2021 04:46, Lijun Ou: > The rte_fdir_conf structure has deprecated and users need > to use the specified rule parameters of rte_flow structure > when configure a flow rule. As a result, it is incorrectly > used in the rte_flow API. Note: it should be "flow director" in the title. I really don't understand why the hns3 PMD is based on flow director concept, because: 1/ this is an Intel design 2/ it was already deprecated when hns3 started his development Please could you explain if there is a HW constraint or something else I'm missing?