From: "Dai, Wei" <wei.dai@intel.com>
To: "Ma, Jianwei" <jianwei.ma@intel.com>,
"Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix Rx queue interrupt mapping in VF
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:10:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49759EB36A64CF4892C1AFEC9231E8D650BA0285@PGSMSX106.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B90411854DEF0649BE56FC396188B4FC3B930B19@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
I look through from web browser and not find following mail from Jianwei Ma <Jianwei.ma@intel.com>
Hope this can add his test result in the mail list to community.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ma, Jianwei
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 4:48 PM
> To: Dai, Wei <wei.dai@intel.com>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>;
> Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix Rx queue interrupt mapping in VF
>
> Verified with l3fwd-power. It worked well with this patch plus
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/29221/ "[dpdk-dev,v2] net/ixgbe:
> fix VFIO interrupt mapping in VF"
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dai, Wei
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 11:26
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Ma, Jianwei <jianwei.ma@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix Rx queue interrupt mapping in VF
>
> Hi, Jianwei
> How about your test result ?
>
> Hi, Wenzhuo
> Would you please review this patch ?
>
> Thanks a lot !
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dai, Wei
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 6:18 PM
> > To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin
> > <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dai, Wei <wei.dai@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix Rx queue interrupt mapping in VF
> >
> > When a VF port is bound to VFIO-PCI, miscellaneous interrupt is mapped
> > to MSI-X vector 0 and Rx queues interrupt are mapped to other vectors
> > in vfio_enable_msix( ). To simplify implementation, all VFIO-PCI bound
> > ixgbe VF Rx queue interrupts can be mapped in vector 1. And as current
> > igb_uio only support only one vector, ixgbe VF PMD should use vector 0
> > for igb_uio and vector 1 for VFIO-PCI. Without this patch, VF Rx queue
> > interrupt is mapped to vector 0 in register settings and mapped to
> > VFIO vector 1 in vfio_enable_msix( ), and then all Rx queue interrupts will
> be missed.
> >
> > Fixes: b13bfab4cdbe ("eal: reserve VFIO vector zero for misc
> > interrupt")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>
Tested-by: Jianwei Ma <Jianwei.ma@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > index 9ca5cbc..39a3d8c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> > @@ -5029,7 +5029,10 @@ ixgbevf_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >
> > /* check and configure queue intr-vector mapping */
> > if (dev->data->dev_conf.intr_conf.rxq != 0) {
> > - intr_vector = dev->data->nb_rx_queues;
> > + /* According to datasheet, only vector 0/1/2 can be used,
> > + * now only one vector is used for Rx queue
> > + */
> > + intr_vector = 1;
> > if (rte_intr_efd_enable(intr_handle, intr_vector))
> > return -1;
> > }
> > @@ -5556,9 +5559,12 @@ ixgbevf_dev_rx_queue_intr_enable(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id)
> > uint32_t mask;
> > struct ixgbe_hw *hw =
> > IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
> > + uint32_t vec = IXGBE_MISC_VEC_ID;
> >
> > mask = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_VTEIMS);
> > - mask |= (1 << IXGBE_MISC_VEC_ID);
> > + if (rte_intr_allow_others(intr_handle))
> > + vec = IXGBE_RX_VEC_START;
> > + mask |= (1 << vec);
> > RTE_SET_USED(queue_id);
> > IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_VTEIMS, mask);
> >
> > @@ -5573,9 +5579,14 @@ ixgbevf_dev_rx_queue_intr_disable(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t queue_id)
> > uint32_t mask;
> > struct ixgbe_hw *hw =
> > IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
> > + struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev = RTE_ETH_DEV_TO_PCI(dev);
> > + struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle = &pci_dev->intr_handle;
> > + uint32_t vec = IXGBE_MISC_VEC_ID;
> >
> > mask = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_VTEIMS);
> > - mask &= ~(1 << IXGBE_MISC_VEC_ID);
> > + if (rte_intr_allow_others(intr_handle))
> > + vec = IXGBE_RX_VEC_START;
> > + mask &= ~(1 << vec);
> > RTE_SET_USED(queue_id);
> > IXGBE_WRITE_REG(hw, IXGBE_VTEIMS, mask);
> >
> > @@ -5717,6 +5728,7 @@ ixgbevf_configure_msix(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev)
> > IXGBE_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data->dev_private);
> > uint32_t q_idx;
> > uint32_t vector_idx = IXGBE_MISC_VEC_ID;
> > + uint32_t base = IXGBE_MISC_VEC_ID;
> >
> > /* Configure VF other cause ivar */
> > ixgbevf_set_ivar_map(hw, -1, 1, vector_idx); @@ -5727,6 +5739,11
> @@
> > ixgbevf_configure_msix(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > if (!rte_intr_dp_is_en(intr_handle))
> > return;
> >
> > + if (rte_intr_allow_others(intr_handle)) {
> > + base = IXGBE_RX_VEC_START;
> > + vector_idx = IXGBE_RX_VEC_START;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* Configure all RX queues of VF */
> > for (q_idx = 0; q_idx < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; q_idx++) {
> > /* Force all queue use vector 0,
> > @@ -5734,6 +5751,8 @@ ixgbevf_configure_msix(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev)
> > */
> > ixgbevf_set_ivar_map(hw, 0, q_idx, vector_idx);
> > intr_handle->intr_vec[q_idx] = vector_idx;
> > + if (vector_idx < base + intr_handle->nb_efd - 1)
> > + vector_idx++;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-11 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-20 10:18 Wei Dai
2017-10-10 3:25 ` Dai, Wei
[not found] ` <B90411854DEF0649BE56FC396188B4FC3B930B19@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2017-10-11 7:10 ` Dai, Wei [this message]
2017-10-11 3:13 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2017-10-11 18:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49759EB36A64CF4892C1AFEC9231E8D650BA0285@PGSMSX106.gar.corp.intel.com \
--to=wei.dai@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jianwei.ma@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).