From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Tudor Cornea <tudor.cornea@gmail.com>
Cc: <padraig.j.connolly@intel.com>, <thomas@monjalon.net>,
<helin.zhang@intel.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] kni: allow configuring the kni thread granularity
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 16:43:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49900a8c-f9d1-f69f-04f8-b49a4aeebd5e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220114082415.69752802@hermes.local>
On 1/14/2022 4:24 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:18:19 +0200
> Tudor Cornea <tudor.cornea@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +module_param(min_scheduling_interval, long, 0644);
>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(min_scheduling_interval,
>> +"\t\tKni thread min scheduling interval (default=100 microseconds):\n"
>> +"\t\t"
>> +);
>> +
>> +module_param(max_scheduling_interval, long, 0644);
>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_scheduling_interval,
>> +"\t\tKni thread max scheduling interval (default=200 microseconds):\n"
>> +"\t\t"
>> +);
>
> Please don't add more bad module parameter strings.
> The KNI author did something no other kernel modules do with tabs
> and double spacing, stop this bogus stuff.
>
The patch is good, let's not block it for the module parameter string,
all can be fixed with another patch.
Can you please give a sample what is a common way of it, me or Tudor can
do the patch?
> Is there any reason you have to use KNI at all.
> KNI is broken on many levels and is not fixable.
> What about virtio or tap?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-14 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-02 10:38 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Tudor Cornea
2021-11-02 15:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Tudor Cornea
2021-11-02 15:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-11-03 20:40 ` Tudor Cornea
2021-11-03 22:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-11-08 10:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Tudor Cornea
2021-11-22 17:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-23 17:08 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-11-24 17:10 ` Tudor Cornea
2021-11-24 19:24 ` [PATCH v4] " Tudor Cornea
2022-01-14 13:53 ` Connolly, Padraig J
2022-01-14 14:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-14 15:18 ` [PATCH v5] " Tudor Cornea
2022-01-14 16:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-01-14 16:43 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2022-01-17 16:24 ` Tudor Cornea
2022-01-20 12:41 ` [PATCH v6] " Tudor Cornea
2022-02-02 19:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49900a8c-f9d1-f69f-04f8-b49a4aeebd5e@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=padraig.j.connolly@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=tudor.cornea@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).