From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sodey@sonusnet.com>
Received: from p02c12o149.mxlogic.net (p02c12o149.mxlogic.net [208.65.145.82])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478C17E86
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:58:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from unknown [66.151.187.11] (EHLO smtp.sonusnet.com)
 by p02c12o149.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-8.2.0-0) over TLS secured channel
 with ESMTP id 3455e345.0.36581.00-376.86175.p02c12o149.mxlogic.net
 (envelope-from <sodey@sonusnet.com>); 
 Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:06:45 -0600 (MDT)
X-MXL-Hash: 543e554536d05d57-5c44a9a16a3f349f7eace1f23e1c827dd7536437
Received: from INBA-HUB01.sonusnet.com (10.70.51.86) by
 psmwsonshc01.sonusnet.com (10.176.20.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
 14.3.158.1; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 07:06:43 -0400
Received: from INBA-MAIL02.sonusnet.com ([10.70.51.89]) by
 inba-hub01.sonusnet.com ([fe80::5cbc:2823:f6cc:9ce7%11]) with mapi id
 14.03.0181.006; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:36:40 +0530
From: "Dey, Souvik" <sodey@sonusnet.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: BUG in IP FRAGMENTATION
Thread-Index: Ac/oZ0B22lKbfrCoTWKqR8L2bLPc9gAAKr1A
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:06:40 +0000
Message-ID: <4B8F36DD0FB25E47B3DA6F493BF591B70DC5972B@inba-mail02.sonusnet.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.70.54.43]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.1 cv=eJMHjRZ1 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=uJKQf5YWhIR+nybujYFUDg==]
X-AnalysisOut: [:117 a=uJKQf5YWhIR+nybujYFUDg==:17 a=URNJFqk9g_oA:10 a=4Rb]
X-AnalysisOut: [SuBE0YzsA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=kUVcWBO]
X-AnalysisOut: [SAAAA:8 a=YlVTAMxIAAAA:8 a=yC_XiuxUPIZpKJf7wxsA:9 a=CjuIK1]
X-AnalysisOut: [q_8ugA:10 a=AFNnEUKN9B0A:10 a=SlESkIbDcEkA:10 a=xrDZOdnm9W]
X-AnalysisOut: [QA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=nfBPkcxsNAKvrEW9]
X-AnalysisOut: [7aEA:9 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:]
X-AnalysisOut: [10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10]
X-Spam: [F=0.5000000000; CM=0.500; MH=0.500(2014101506); S=0.200(2014051901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <sodey@sonusnet.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [66.151.187.11]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: "Patil, PraveenKumar" <ppatil@sonusnet.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] FW: BUG in IP FRAGMENTATION
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:58:57 -0000


Hi,
                In DPDK1.6 do we support overlapped fragments while doing r=
eassembly. Also why we don't consider the first or last fragment to be out-=
of-order. Are this known limitations in DPDK or they are not working due to=
 some bugs in the code ?

--
Regards,
Souvik