Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] doc: add guide for debug and troubleshoot

["Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@intel.com>]

Thanks Marko, I will spin v5 with the changes asap.

Note: Just wondering why 'devtools/checkpatches.sh' did not report any error.

Thanks
Vipin Varghese

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kovacevic, Marko
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 8:59 PM
> To: Varghese, Vipin <vipin.varghese@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org;
> shreyansh.jain@nxp.com; thomas@monjalon.net
> Cc: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Patel, Amol
> <amol.patel@intel.com>; Padubidri, Sanjay A <sanjay.padubidri@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 2/2] doc: add guide for debug and troubleshoot
> 
> After checking the patch again I found a few spelling mistakes
> 
> > Add user guide on debug and troubleshoot for common issues and
> > bottleneck found in sample application model.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vipin Varghese <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  doc/guides/howto/debug_troubleshoot_guide.rst | 375
> > ++++++++++++++++++
> >  doc/guides/howto/index.rst                    |   1 +
> >  2 files changed, 376 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 doc/guides/howto/debug_troubleshoot_guide.rst
> >
> 
> <...>
> 
> receieve / receive
> 
> > +    -  If stats for RX and drops updated on same queue? check
> > + receieve
> > thread
> > +    -  If packet does not reach PMD? check if offload for port and queue
> > +       matches to traffic pattern send.
> > +
> 
> <...>
> 
> Offlaod/ offload
> 
> > +    -  Is the packet multi segmented? Check if port and queue offlaod is set.
> > +
> > +Are there object drops in producer point for ring?
> > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> <...>
> 
> sufficent / sufficient
> 
> > +    -  Are drops on specific socket? If yes check if there are sufficent
> > +       objects by rte_mempool_get_count() or rte_mempool_avail_count()
> > +    -  Is 'rte_mempool_get_count() or rte_mempool_avail_count()' zero?
> > +       application requires more objects hence reconfigure number of
> > +       elements in rte_mempool_create().
> > +    -  Is there single RX thread for multiple NIC? try having multiple
> > +       lcore to read from fixed interface or we might be hitting cache
> > +       limit, so increase cache_size for pool_create().
> > +
> 
> Sceanrios/ scenarios
> 
> > +#. Is performance low for some sceanrios?
> > +    -  Check if sufficient objects in mempool by rte_mempool_avail_count()
> > +    -  Is failure seen in some packets? we might be getting packets with
> > +       'size > mbuf data size'.
> > +    -  Is NIC offload or application handling multi segment mbuf? check the
> > +       special packets are continuous with rte_pktmbuf_is_contiguous().
> > +    -  If there separate user threads used to access mempool objects, use
> > +       rte_mempool_cache_create() for non DPDK threads.
> 
> debuging / debugging
> 
> > +    -  Is the error reproducible with 1GB hugepage? If no, then try debuging
> > +       the issue with lookup table or objects with rte_mem_lock_page().
> > +
> > +.. note::
> > +  Stall in release of MBUF can be because
> 
> <...>
> 
> softwre / software
> 
> > +    -  If softwre crypto is in use, check if the CRYPTO Library is build with
> > +       right (SIMD) flags or check if the queue pair using CPU ISA for
> > +       feature_flags AVX|SSE|NEON using rte_cryptodev_info_get()
> 
> Assited/ assisted
> 
> > +    -  If its hardware assited crypto showing performance variance? Check if
> > +       hardware is on same NUMA socket as queue pair and session pool.
> > +
> 
> <...>
> 
> exceeeding / exceeding
> 
> > +       core? registered functions may be exceeeding the desired time slots
> > +       while running on same service core.
> > +    -  Is function is running on RTE core? check if there are conflicting
> > +       functions running on same CPU core by rte_thread_get_affinity().
> > +
> 
> <...>
> 
> > +#. Where to capture packets?
> > +    -  Enable pdump in primary to allow secondary to access queue-pair for
> > +       ports. Thus packets are copied over in RX|TX callback by secondary
> > +       process using ring buffers.
> > +    -  To capture packet in middle of pipeline stage, user specific hooks
> > +       or callback are to be used to copy the packets. These packets
> > +can
> 
> secodnary / secondary
> 
> > +       be shared to secodnary process via user defined custom rings.
> > +
> > +Issue still persists?
> > +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > +
> > +#. Are there custom or vendor specific offload meta data?
> > +    -  From PMD, then check for META data error and drops.
> > +    -  From application, then check for META data error and drops.
> > +#. Is multiprocess is used configuration and data processing?
> > +    -  Check enabling or disabling features from secondary is
> > +supported or
> > not?
> 
> Obejcts/ objects
> 
> > +#. Is there drops for certain scenario for packets or obejcts?
> > +    -  Check user private data in objects by dumping the details for debug.
> > +
> <...>
> 
> Thanks,
> Marko K