From: "Varghese, Vipin" <vipin.varghese@intel.com>
To: "Loftus, Ciara" <ciara.loftus@intel.com>,
'Stephen Hemminger' <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "'dev@dpdk.org'" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Ye, Xiaolong" <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>,
"Laatz, Kevin" <kevin.laatz@intel.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] net/af_xdp: support pinning of IRQs
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:52:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C9E0AB70F954A408CC4ADDBF0F8FA7D4D3DCF94@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74F120C019F4A64C9B78E802F6AD4CC27924737D@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi Ciara,
snipped
>
> ifaces no pinning pinning
> 1 9059100 9171612
> 2 9261635 18376552
> 3 9332804 27696702
>
> For the no-pinning case, all IRQs are landing on the default core 0, which
> results in very poor scaling versus the pinned case where scaling is linear.
Thanks for the information, but a question here `Is the reason for landing all IRQ on core '0' is because the Kernel CMD line 'isol or no interupts' is done for all expect core 0?`
If the cores are not isolated and no interrupts are redirected; normally `cat /proc/interrupts` shows IRQ mask to cores. Depending upon FDIR (intel X522 and X710) this could be core 0 or 'n-1'?
>
> Thanks,
> Ciara
>
> >
> > It should be possible to rework the code to remove the regexes and use
> > a direct string compare. Would that make the solution more palatable?
> >
> > Let me know what you think.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ciara
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-21 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-30 16:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] AF_XDP tx halt fix, IRQ pinning and unaligned chunks Ciara Loftus
2019-09-30 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] net/af_xdp: fix Tx halt when no recv packets Ciara Loftus
2019-10-22 5:32 ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-09-30 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] net/af_xdp: support pinning of IRQs Ciara Loftus
2019-09-30 17:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-10-03 13:23 ` Loftus, Ciara
2019-10-14 14:43 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-21 15:24 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-21 15:54 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-21 16:02 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-21 16:14 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-15 11:14 ` Ray Kinsella
2019-10-21 10:04 ` Loftus, Ciara
2019-10-21 12:52 ` Varghese, Vipin [this message]
2019-10-21 13:04 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-21 13:11 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-10-21 13:17 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-21 13:45 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-10-21 13:56 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-10-21 14:06 ` Varghese, Vipin
2019-10-18 23:49 ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-09-30 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] net/af_xdp: enable support for unaligned umem chunks Ciara Loftus
2019-10-18 23:48 ` Ye Xiaolong
2019-10-22 14:28 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-10-24 11:10 ` David Marchand
2019-10-24 12:18 ` David Marchand
2019-10-24 14:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C9E0AB70F954A408CC4ADDBF0F8FA7D4D3DCF94@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com \
--to=vipin.varghese@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).