From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fncnmp03.fnc.fujitsu.com (fncnmp03.fnc.fujitsu.com [168.127.0.56]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB02E376C for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 15:55:35 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,434,1427778000"; d="scan'208,217";a="63498709" Received: from rchexhcp1.fnc.net.local ([168.127.134.75]) by fncnmp01.fnc.fujitsu.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 15 May 2015 08:55:33 -0500 Received: from RCHEXMBP1.fnc.net.local ([169.254.2.128]) by RCHEXHCP1.fnc.net.local ([168.127.134.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Fri, 15 May 2015 08:55:32 -0500 From: "Rao, Ravi" To: "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: performance issue with ovs + dpdk2.0 with vhost Thread-Index: AdCPFknfFJlsafyqQZmMtcoKX1wHeQ== Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 13:55:32 +0000 Message-ID: <4E5A07CF014F73489C60025F5BCB7834EBC15D9C@RCHEXMBP1.fnc.net.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [168.127.136.253] x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.3176-7.500.1018-21546.007 x-tm-as-result: No--46.520300-0.000000-31 x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] performance issue with ovs + dpdk2.0 with vhost X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 13:55:36 -0000 Hi All, I am trying to get a Guest VM connected to the dpdkvhost interface on a = host which has the ovs running from the latest ovs git and dpdk2.0. Looks l= ike I am missing something as 95% of traffic is not getting to the VM. Can = one of you please let me know which mailing list I should be posting the de= tails for getting a resolution. Is it this dpdk list OR would it be the ope= nvswitch list? Regards, Ravi..