From: "Rao, Ravi" <Ravi.Rao@us.fujitsu.com>
To: "Czesnowicz, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.czesnowicz@intel.com>,
"Thomas F Herbert" <therbert@redhat.com>,
"O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.o'driscoll@intel.com>,
"Butler, Siobhan A" <siobhan.a.butler@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] dev@DPDK Hackathon Proposal
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 17:06:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5A07CF014F73489C60025F5BCB7834EBC171E7@RCHEXMBP1.fnc.net.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FD920D91FA434C4988D04BF2D401125919DC5100@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi Przemek/Thomas,
Thanks for the info. But when I am using the latest ovs and the DPDK2.0 the performance I am getting through the ovs switch is far less than non dpdk.
I can send more info if you need.
I am using dpdkvhost0 and dpdkvhos1 interfaces that are based on vhost_cuse to interact with VM. Is there any post that I can refer to see what I may be missing ?
Currently these are my tasks
1. Measure throughput with Just OVS on Host only == completed (600,000 pps) *No Flow control
2. Measure throughput with OVS+DPDK on Host only == completed (6.4 Mpps)
3. Measure throughput on Guest spunup using QEMU with OVS bridge on Host == completed (240,000 pps)
4. Measure throughput on Guest spunup using QEMU with OVS DPDK on Host == Having issues with perf just getting 60,000 pps
5. Measure throughput on Guest spunup using Openstack with just OVS on Compute node == completed (60,000 pps)
6. Measure throughput on Guest spunup using Openstack with OVS DPDK on Compute node. I can use the info provided by you and see if I can get this running ??
Regards,
Ravi..
-----Original Message-----
From: Czesnowicz, Przemyslaw [mailto:przemyslaw.czesnowicz@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:09 AM
To: Rao, Ravi; Thomas F Herbert; O'Driscoll, Tim; Butler, Siobhan A; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] dev@DPDK Hackathon Proposal
Hi Ravi,
Kilo release of Openstack allows to use ovs-dpdk with vhostuser.
Nova includes vhost-user vif driver, and for neutron we have a mechanism driver and agent in stackforge project :
https://github.com/stackforge/networking-ovs-dpdk
The neutron part is hosted on stackforge because of vendor decomposition going on in neutron.
The contains a devstack plugin and instructions on how to setup the node.
Let me know if you need more information.
Regards
Przemek
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Rao, Ravi
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 2:43 PM
> To: Thomas F Herbert; O'Driscoll, Tim; Butler, Siobhan A; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] dev@DPDK Hackathon Proposal
>
> Hi All,
> Effort and emphasis has to be made to integrate DPDK into openstack
> components like neutron and nova so that this becomes part of std
> openstack release.
> Currently some work was done and published as a patch to devstack's
> Juno but there are no clear path to incorporate these patches to the
> mainline. I think this would be a very good topic to cover.
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas F Herbert
> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 8:37 AM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; Butler, Siobhan A; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] dev@DPDK Hackathon Proposal
>
> On 5/19/15 8:59 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> > There wasn't any public response to this but we did discuss it with
> > several
> people separately who all thought it was a good idea. Therefore, we've
> decided to go ahead with it. Siobhan is working on the plan now and
> should be in a position to make a formal announcement in a few weeks.
> >
> > In the meantime, I wanted to let people know that this is going
> > ahead so
> that you can:
> > a) Save the date. October 8th/9th, immediately after the European
> LinuxCon, in Dublin Ireland.
> > b) Think about topics that you'd like to see covered. We'll solicit
> > for inputs
> when the formal announcement is made, but it's good for people to
> begin thinking about this now.
> >
> Tim, I for one think it is a good idea. +1 from me.
> > We'd like this to be quite an interactive event with a lot of
> > discussion rather
> than just presentations. We plan to have many of our key DPDK
> developers there, so it will be a great opportunity to network,
> discuss the technical challenges that you're facing and help to build a stronger DPDK community.
> >
>
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Butler,
> >> Siobhan A
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 7:19 PM
> >> To: dev@dpdk.org
> >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] dev@DPDK Hackathon Proposal
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> As a community we have virtually come together from all over the
> >> globe, developing now our third successful open source DPDK version
> >> with DPDK
> >> r2.0 about to release.
> >> It is astounding to comprehend the commitment and enthusiasm you
> have
> >> all shared to bring DPDK to this point.
> >> With growing the community of developers in mind, and strengthening
> >> the networks and virtual collaborations that have come about, I
> >> propose that we hold the first dev@DPDK Developer Hackathon this year.
> >>
> >> Many people will be travelling to Dublin, Ireland for LinuxCon and
> >> CloudOpen October (5th-7th).
> >> I propose that we hold a hands on 2 day hackathon Thursday October
> >> 8th and Friday October 9th to coincide with this offering, in Dublin.
> >> From a community perspective is a great opportunity to bring
> >> together the people that make DPDK happen - the developers.
> >> From a developer perspective it is a great opportunity to be part
> >> of the first gathering, meet some new people, learn something new
> >> and have a lot of fun on the way.
> >>
> >> At this point the agenda is open - so if you see merit in this
> >> proposal please share your interest here so that we can gauge
> >> attendance and gather ideas of what people would like the format to be.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Siobhan
> >> <siobhan.a.butler@intel.com>
>
> --
> Thomas F Herbert
> Principal Software Engineer
> Red Hat
> therbert@redhat.com
> Office: 919-301-3295
> Mobile: 804-741-2695
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-31 18:18 Butler, Siobhan A
2015-05-19 12:59 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-05-19 13:36 ` Thomas F Herbert
2015-05-19 13:43 ` Rao, Ravi
2015-05-19 14:09 ` Thomas F Herbert
2015-05-19 14:18 ` Butler, Siobhan A
2015-05-19 14:22 ` Vincent JARDIN
2015-05-19 14:46 ` Thomas F Herbert
2015-05-19 16:08 ` Czesnowicz, Przemyslaw
2015-05-19 17:06 ` Rao, Ravi [this message]
2015-05-19 21:22 ` Traynor, Kevin
2015-05-19 18:18 ` Rao, Ravi
2015-05-19 14:20 ` Vincent JARDIN
2015-05-19 14:23 ` Butler, Siobhan A
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E5A07CF014F73489C60025F5BCB7834EBC171E7@RCHEXMBP1.fnc.net.local \
--to=ravi.rao@us.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=przemyslaw.czesnowicz@intel.com \
--cc=siobhan.a.butler@intel.com \
--cc=therbert@redhat.com \
--cc=tim.o'driscoll@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).