From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fncnmp03.fnc.fujitsu.com (fncnmp03.fnc.fujitsu.com [168.127.0.56]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B535692 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 19:06:55 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,459,1427778000"; d="scan'208";a="63614556" Received: from rchexhcp1.fnc.net.local ([168.127.134.75]) by fncnmp01.fnc.fujitsu.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 19 May 2015 12:06:53 -0500 Received: from RCHEXMBP1.fnc.net.local ([169.254.2.128]) by RCHEXHCP1.fnc.net.local ([168.127.134.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Tue, 19 May 2015 12:06:53 -0500 From: "Rao, Ravi" To: "Czesnowicz, Przemyslaw" , "Thomas F Herbert" , "O'Driscoll, Tim" , "Butler, Siobhan A" , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] dev@DPDK Hackathon Proposal Thread-Index: AdBr3Q7u2yYTYGVWSqWalKpXKJCSCAmUxkiQAAyl/gAACl/EwP//120AgABK5LA= Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 17:06:52 +0000 Message-ID: <4E5A07CF014F73489C60025F5BCB7834EBC171E7@RCHEXMBP1.fnc.net.local> References: <0C5AFCA4B3408848ADF2A3073F7D8CC86D5813A3@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA54D46597@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <555B3C6A.8080806@redhat.com> <4E5A07CF014F73489C60025F5BCB7834EBC170CE@RCHEXMBP1.fnc.net.local> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [168.127.136.253] x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.3176-8.000.1202-21556.001 x-tm-as-result: No--67.681600-0.000000-31 x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] dev@DPDK Hackathon Proposal X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 17:06:56 -0000 Hi Przemek/Thomas, Thanks for the info. But when I am using the latest ovs and the DPDK2.0 = the performance I am getting through the ovs switch is far less than non dp= dk.=20 I can send more info if you need.=20 I am using dpdkvhost0 and dpdkvhos1 interfaces that are based on vhost_cuse= to interact with VM. Is there any post that I can refer to see what I may = be missing ? Currently these are my tasks 1. Measure throughput with Just OVS on Host only =3D=3D completed (600,000 = pps) *No Flow control 2. Measure throughput with OVS+DPDK on Host only =3D=3D completed (6.4 Mpps= ) 3. Measure throughput on Guest spunup using QEMU with OVS bridge on Host = =3D=3D completed (240,000 pps) 4. Measure throughput on Guest spunup using QEMU with OVS DPDK on Host =3D= =3D Having issues with perf just getting 60,000 pps 5. Measure throughput on Guest spunup using Openstack with just OVS on Comp= ute node =3D=3D completed (60,000 pps) 6. Measure throughput on Guest spunup using Openstack with OVS DPDK on Comp= ute node. I can use the info provided by you and see if I can get this runn= ing ?? Regards, Ravi.. -----Original Message----- From: Czesnowicz, Przemyslaw [mailto:przemyslaw.czesnowicz@intel.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:09 AM To: Rao, Ravi; Thomas F Herbert; O'Driscoll, Tim; Butler, Siobhan A; dev@dp= dk.org Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] dev@DPDK Hackathon Proposal Hi Ravi, Kilo release of Openstack allows to use ovs-dpdk with vhostuser.=20 Nova includes vhost-user vif driver, and for neutron we have a mechanism dr= iver and agent in stackforge project : https://github.com/stackforge/networking-ovs-dpdk The neutron part is hosted on stackforge because of vendor decomposition g= oing on in neutron. The contains a devstack plugin and instructions on how to setup the node. Let me know if you need more information. Regards Przemek > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Rao, Ravi > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 2:43 PM > To: Thomas F Herbert; O'Driscoll, Tim; Butler, Siobhan A; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] dev@DPDK Hackathon Proposal >=20 > Hi All, > Effort and emphasis has to be made to integrate DPDK into openstack=20 > components like neutron and nova so that this becomes part of std=20 > openstack release. > Currently some work was done and published as a patch to devstack's=20 > Juno but there are no clear path to incorporate these patches to the=20 > mainline. I think this would be a very good topic to cover. > Regards, > Ravi >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas F Herbert > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 8:37 AM > To: O'Driscoll, Tim; Butler, Siobhan A; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] dev@DPDK Hackathon Proposal >=20 > On 5/19/15 8:59 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote: > > There wasn't any public response to this but we did discuss it with=20 > > several > people separately who all thought it was a good idea. Therefore, we've=20 > decided to go ahead with it. Siobhan is working on the plan now and=20 > should be in a position to make a formal announcement in a few weeks. > > > > In the meantime, I wanted to let people know that this is going=20 > > ahead so > that you can: > > a) Save the date. October 8th/9th, immediately after the European > LinuxCon, in Dublin Ireland. > > b) Think about topics that you'd like to see covered. We'll solicit=20 > > for inputs > when the formal announcement is made, but it's good for people to=20 > begin thinking about this now. > > > Tim, I for one think it is a good idea. +1 from me. > > We'd like this to be quite an interactive event with a lot of=20 > > discussion rather > than just presentations. We plan to have many of our key DPDK=20 > developers there, so it will be a great opportunity to network,=20 > discuss the technical challenges that you're facing and help to build a s= tronger DPDK community. > > >=20 > > > > Tim > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Butler,=20 > >> Siobhan A > >> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 7:19 PM > >> To: dev@dpdk.org > >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] dev@DPDK Hackathon Proposal > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> As a community we have virtually come together from all over the=20 > >> globe, developing now our third successful open source DPDK version=20 > >> with DPDK > >> r2.0 about to release. > >> It is astounding to comprehend the commitment and enthusiasm you > have > >> all shared to bring DPDK to this point. > >> With growing the community of developers in mind, and strengthening=20 > >> the networks and virtual collaborations that have come about, I=20 > >> propose that we hold the first dev@DPDK Developer Hackathon this year. > >> > >> Many people will be travelling to Dublin, Ireland for LinuxCon and=20 > >> CloudOpen October (5th-7th). > >> I propose that we hold a hands on 2 day hackathon Thursday October=20 > >> 8th and Friday October 9th to coincide with this offering, in Dublin. > >> From a community perspective is a great opportunity to bring=20 > >> together the people that make DPDK happen - the developers. > >> From a developer perspective it is a great opportunity to be part=20 > >> of the first gathering, meet some new people, learn something new=20 > >> and have a lot of fun on the way. > >> > >> At this point the agenda is open - so if you see merit in this=20 > >> proposal please share your interest here so that we can gauge=20 > >> attendance and gather ideas of what people would like the format to be= . > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Siobhan > >> >=20 > -- > Thomas F Herbert > Principal Software Engineer > Red Hat > therbert@redhat.com > Office: 919-301-3295 > Mobile: 804-741-2695