From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13CEA0032;
	Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:34:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900794021D;
	Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:34:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548DE40156
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:34:17 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
 s=mimecast20190719; t=1663148056;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=xPcoCZXHfwzmNcetqs78zKQ8h7+oQId07uLzZnqk1R4=;
 b=XUELBYs/Dx2dNV9igRigUImhLaUXA3CsPUl9y7mW6dwQo602+VULn6G6a5ZdgndwzuuEiR
 olCWk5MKuJ89CCNQQG/yLuFtnHM15fAvOiKx0DkrD35JQKbig+Zn0rxYrplXB8ay/1OMqx
 1r8X0szyQY6i71+ErrzSXL7CI6mwMww=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com
 [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-516-p-eIX2FtOrOH77wX1gVBGQ-1; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:34:14 -0400
X-MC-Unique: p-eIX2FtOrOH77wX1gVBGQ-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com
 [10.11.54.6])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEEC88027ED;
 Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:34:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.39.208.26] (unknown [10.39.208.26])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9302166B26;
 Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:34:12 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4ac23626-27fb-e319-8050-82f504393589@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 11:34:11 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] vhost: fix vq use after free on NUMA reallocation
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, "Xia, Chenbo"
 <chenbo.xia@intel.com>, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
References: <20220722135320.109269-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
 <SN6PR11MB3504AD228FF5BC3AC6FBA8999C469@SN6PR11MB3504.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
 <8e7d0748-afa9-0ed0-443a-62b2523d7403@redhat.com> <2718825.BEx9A2HvPv@thomas>
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <2718825.BEx9A2HvPv@thomas>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org



On 9/14/22 11:15, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 14/09/2022 09:14, Maxime Coquelin:
>> On 9/14/22 03:05, Xia, Chenbo wrote:
>>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>>>> On 7/26/22 09:55, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>>> The bug this patch is fixing is being reproduced downstream.
>>>> It would be great it gets merged in main branch rapidly so that we can
>>>> perform the backport.
>>>>
>>>> Chenbo, are you planning a pull request for vhost/virtio in the next few
>>>> days? If not, should the main branch maintainer pick this single patch
>>>> directly and let the rest of the series more time for reviews?
>>>
>>> Based on the status of all patches in the list, I guess PR will not happen
>>> this week. So it will be good if David/Thomas can directly pick up this.
>>
>> OK, sounds good to me.
>>
>> Thomas/David, is that good on your side?
> 
> Is there a blocker to merge the whole series?

No, I reviewed the whole series.

But other patches are an enhancement, so it would not hurt to have more
reviews.

I am fine either way.

Thanks,
Maxime