From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95998A0524; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:06:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A2D412B0; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:06:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shelob.oktetlabs.ru (shelob.oktetlabs.ru [91.220.146.113]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0552411A5 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:06:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.38.17] (aros.oktetlabs.ru [192.168.38.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by shelob.oktetlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49C7A7F50E; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 13:06:17 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 shelob.oktetlabs.ru 49C7A7F50E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=oktetlabs.ru; s=default; t=1618913177; bh=aqhYKoDqi0YTnW+ZO7XUdQNPwNRcYJCaZwzVewsJNRs=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Qbdrg6zWdLcBV+KngYh11CwnxfJ0JNbEW1Jgk/80exo1VrBYhLOYaJZa3ptZInxfs lU8qBN9izuh45fkPL1xdFw4aoyM5/XW9Ji1akYxHOBT7s1bZYWY16PU207DCsxABHO Jx6CKFe1FhpzxWWI/O6v2Z4hGFTTTb2DPHWUqBp8= To: Thomas Monjalon , "Liu, Lingyu" Cc: Olivier Matz , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Zhang, Qi Z" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , Hemant Agrawal References: <20210417090415.5477-1-lingyu.liu@intel.com> <20210419142453.GC1726@platinum> <1960280.AK4zKTLmrX@thomas> From: Andrew Rybchenko Organization: OKTET Labs Message-ID: <4b9a915a-6b0e-ea27-3396-c5231b2843c9@oktetlabs.ru> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 13:06:17 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1960280.AK4zKTLmrX@thomas> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mbuf: support eCPRI hardware packet type X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 4/20/21 10:51 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 20/04/2021 04:17, Liu, Lingyu: >> Hi Olivier, >> >> This new packet type will be used by iavf driver to map ECPRI hardware packet. >> This is the patch which will use this new hardware packet type. >> http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210420083817.10741-3-lingyu.liu@intel.com/ > > I think it does not reply Olivier's question about how it will be used. > Why is it important to report this packet type in mbuf? +1 > PS: please do not top-post > > >>> From: Olivier Matz >>> >>> Hi Lingyu, >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 09:25:31AM +0000, Lingyu Liu wrote: >>>> Add L2_ETHER_ECPRI and L4_UDP_TUNNEL_ECPRI in RTE_PTYPE. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lingyu Liu >>>> Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal >>> >>> The number of available packet types for tunnels is quite low (already >>> mentionned in this thread [1]). >>> >>> [1] https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210408081720.23314-3- >>> ktejasree@marvell.com >>> >>> Can you give some details about how it will be used? For instance, which >>> driver will set it, which kind of application will use it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Olivier > >