From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238401B501 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:29:32 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jan 2019 08:29:32 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,451,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="133689266" Received: from aburakov-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.16.99]) ([10.252.16.99]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2019 08:29:29 -0800 To: Bruce Richardson , Stephen Hemminger Cc: 'Thomas Monjalon' , 'Jason Messer' , 'Harini Ramakrishnan' , 'Omar Cardona' , 'Ranjit Menon' , =?UTF-8?Q?=27Mattias_R=c3=b6nnblom=27?= , 'Jeff Shaw' , dev@dpdk.org References: <7824863.MkUOD0j12R@xps> <005401d4a32e$2f20f860$8d62e920$@networkplumber.org> <20190107075138.654e0be5@hermes.lan> <20190107161534.GA15532@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Message-ID: <4ca4ff83-d226-12c4-913c-22737dfc5bb6@intel.com> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 16:29:25 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190107161534.GA15532@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Compiler for Windows X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 16:29:33 -0000 On 07-Jan-19 4:15 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:51:38AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 10:56:57 +0000 >> "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote: >> >>> On 03-Jan-19 6:33 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >>>> What about Gcc under the WSL thing (ie Linux emulation in Windows). >>>> Much better than Cygwin type stuff. >>>> >>> >>> WSL is dog-slow with any kind of disk I/O, at least currently, so while >>> i do use WSL to fool my IDE into thinking it's running on Linux, the >>> actual compilation user experience is horrible. >>> >> >> The newest version uses Hyper-V to run Linux kernel in VM and is better. >> Probably all still has issues with translation to NTFS. Yes, but it takes a while for "newest versions" to trickle down on our dev machines :) > > But is running that going to produce windows binaries rather than linux > ones? > I believe it's producing Linux binaries, not Windows ones. So probably a non-starter. -- Thanks, Anatoly