From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2315198 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 22:05:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Mar 2017 13:05:35 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,243,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="232309813" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.46.146]) ([10.254.46.146]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2017 13:05:33 -0800 To: Andrew Rybchenko , dev@dpdk.org References: <1488438439-14776-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> <1488438439-14776-5-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <4cf94090-f110-2d83-c1d8-648719153196@intel.com> Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 21:05:33 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1488438439-14776-5-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/13] net/sfc: factor out libefx-based Rx datapath X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 21:05:36 -0000 On 3/2/2017 7:07 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > Split control and datapath to make datapath substitutable and > possibly reusable with alternative control path. Does it make sense to document how alternative control path can be used? > > libefx-based Rx datapath is bound to libefx control path, but > other datapaths should be possible to use with alternative > control path(s). > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <...>