From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F2AA056E; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:36:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0941BFFD; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:36:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490DA1BFFC for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:36:01 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Mar 2020 06:35:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,541,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="236444392" Received: from dwdohert-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [163.33.176.237]) ([163.33.176.237]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2020 06:35:57 -0700 To: Anoob Joseph , "Shetty, Praveen" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Iremonger, Bernard" , "Ananyev, Konstantin" References: <20200306055609.11734-1-praveen.shetty@intel.com> From: "Doherty, Declan" Message-ID: <4f4859c0-ca04-fc0c-db9b-934727f4a2bd@intel.com> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:35:56 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] examples/ipsec-secgw: load/unload esp-ah DDP file X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/03/2020 4:24 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote: > Hi Praveen, > > [Anoob] Rather than calling PMD specific functions from all applications, it might be better to introduce the same via 'devargs' to the PMD. > > [Praveen Shetty] We will investigate further on this. > > Probably let's converge on this before sending v2. I don't think we should add a new option just specific to one PMD. Devargs already provides the required framework and other PMDs are already using it. I agree this would be better handled by driver specific devargs > > @Konstatin, @Akhil, > What is your take on this? > > Thanks, > Anoob > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shetty, Praveen >> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 5:11 PM >> To: Anoob Joseph ; dev@dpdk.org; Doherty, Declan >> ; Iremonger, Bernard >> ; Ananyev, Konstantin >> >> Subject: [EXT] RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] examples/ipsec-secgw: load/unload >> esp-ah DDP file >> ... >>> -- >>> 2.17.1 >