DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	 Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 4/4] net/netvsc: check for overflow on packet info from host
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 08:43:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4fb44313-706b-3d31-795d-7b1a54e3acd3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c2511e1a6c42b716abc7434f1a32d11d529ab32.camel@debian.org>

On 10/28/2020 11:08 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 23:07 +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 10/27/2020 5:10 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2020-08-10 at 19:33 -0700, longli@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
>>>> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>>>>
>>>> The data from the host is trusted but checked by the driver.
>>>> One check that is missing is that the packet offset and length
>>>> might cause wraparound.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c | 6 ++++--
>>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
>>>> index a388ff258..d8d3f07f5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c
>>>> @@ -666,7 +666,8 @@ static void hn_rndis_rx_data(struct hn_rx_queue *rxq,
>>>>    			     struct hn_rx_bufinfo *rxb,
>>>>    			     void *data, uint32_t dlen)
>>>>    {
>>>> -	unsigned int data_off, data_len, pktinfo_off, pktinfo_len;
>>>> +	unsigned int data_off, data_len, total_len;
>>>> +	unsigned int pktinfo_off, pktinfo_len;
>>>>    	const struct rndis_packet_msg *pkt = data;
>>>>    	struct hn_rxinfo info = {
>>>>    		.vlan_info = HN_NDIS_VLAN_INFO_INVALID,
>>>> @@ -711,7 +712,8 @@ static void hn_rndis_rx_data(struct hn_rx_queue *rxq,
>>>>    			goto error;
>>>>    	}
>>>>    
>>>> -	if (unlikely(data_off + data_len > pkt->len))
>>>> +	if (__builtin_add_overflow(data_off, data_len, &total_len) ||
>>>> +	    total_len > pkt->len)
>>>>    		goto error;
>>>>    
>>>>    	if (unlikely(data_len < RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN))
>>>
>>> This patch breaks the build with GCC < 5 (CentOS 7, RHEL 7, SLE 12) as
>>> __builtin_add_overflow is not available. Could you please send a follow
>>> up to fix it?
>>>
>>
>> It should be already fixed in the repo:
>> https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=d73543b5f46d
>>
>> Are you getting the build error with 20.11-rc1?
> 
> No, with the backport. The original patch was marked for stable, but
> the fixup was not.

Yes, it should be also marked for stable, seems missed.

> I'll pick it up.
> 

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-29  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-11  2:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/netvsc: move rxbuf_info from per-device to per-queue longli
2020-08-11  2:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] bus/vmbus: remove vmbus_send_interrupt longli
2020-08-11 15:31   ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-08-11  2:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/netvsc: mark chim_index as NVS_CHIM_IDX_INVALID after freeing it longli
2020-08-11 15:32   ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-08-11  2:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/netvsc: check for overflow on packet info from host longli
2020-08-11 15:42   ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-10-27 17:10   ` Luca Boccassi
2020-10-27 23:07     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-10-28 11:08       ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Luca Boccassi
2020-10-29  8:43         ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2020-08-16 23:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/netvsc: move rxbuf_info from per-device to per-queue Stephen Hemminger
2020-08-19 15:36   ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4fb44313-706b-3d31-795d-7b1a54e3acd3@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=longli@microsoft.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).