* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores
@ 2015-02-15 5:47 Cunming Liang
2015-02-15 6:58 ` Qiu, Michael
2015-02-24 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Cunming Liang @ 2015-02-15 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
The patch add unit test for the new eal option "--lcores".
Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com>
---
It depends on the previous patch which enabling EAL "--lcores" option.
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013204.html
app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
index 0a8269c..0352f87 100644
--- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
+++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
@@ -512,47 +512,114 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void)
/* -c flag but no coremask value */
const char *argv1[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c"};
- /* No -c or -l flag at all */
+ /* No -c, -l or --lcores flag at all */
const char *argv2[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3"};
/* bad coremask value */
- const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "error" };
+ const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-c", "error" };
/* sanity check of tests - valid coremask value */
- const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "1" };
+ const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-c", "1" };
/* -l flag but no corelist value */
- const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l"};
- const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", " " };
+ const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-l"};
+ const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-l", " " };
/* bad corelist values */
- const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "error" };
- const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" };
- const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
- const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
+ const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-l", "error" };
+ const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" };
+ const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
+ const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
/* sanity check test - valid corelist value */
- const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
+ const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
+
+ /* --lcores flag but no lcores value */
+ const char *argv12[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores" };
+ const char *argv13[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores", " " };
+ /* bad lcores value */
+ const char *argv14[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3-5" };
+ const char *argv15[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-1,,2" };
+ const char *argv16[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-,1" };
+ const char *argv17[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(0-,2-4)" };
+ const char *argv18[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(-1,2)" };
+ const char *argv19[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(2-4)@(2-4-6)" };
+ const char *argv20[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(a,2)" };
+ const char *argv21[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3@(1,3)" };
+ const char *argv22[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores", "3@((1,3)" };
+ const char *argv23[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(4-7)=(1,3)" };
+ const char *argv24[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores", "[4-7]@(1,3)" };
+ /* sanity check of tests - valid lcores value */
+ const char *argv25[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
+ "-n", "3", "--lcores",
+ "0-1,2@(5-7),(3-5)@(0,2),(0,6),7"};
if (launch_proc(argv1) == 0
|| launch_proc(argv2) == 0
|| launch_proc(argv3) == 0) {
- printf("Error - process ran without error when missing -c flag\n");
+ printf("Error - "
+ "process ran without error when missing -c flag\n");
return -1;
}
if (launch_proc(argv4) != 0) {
- printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n");
+ printf("Error - "
+ "process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n");
return -1;
}
+ /* start -l test */
if (launch_proc(argv5) == 0
|| launch_proc(argv6) == 0
|| launch_proc(argv7) == 0
|| launch_proc(argv8) == 0
|| launch_proc(argv9) == 0
|| launch_proc(argv10) == 0) {
- printf("Error - process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
+ printf("Error - "
+ "process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
return -1;
}
if (launch_proc(argv11) != 0) {
- printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
+ printf("Error - "
+ "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
return -1;
}
+
+ /* start --lcores tests */
+ if (launch_proc(argv12) == 0 || launch_proc(argv13) == 0 ||
+ launch_proc(argv14) == 0 || launch_proc(argv15) == 0 ||
+ launch_proc(argv16) == 0 || launch_proc(argv17) == 0 ||
+ launch_proc(argv18) == 0 || launch_proc(argv19) == 0 ||
+ launch_proc(argv20) == 0 || launch_proc(argv21) == 0 ||
+ launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || launch_proc(argv22) == 0 ||
+ launch_proc(argv23) == 0 || launch_proc(argv24) == 0) {
+ printf("Error - "
+ "process ran without error with invalid --lcore flag\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (launch_proc(argv25) != 0) {
+ printf("Error - "
+ "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
return 0;
}
--
1.8.1.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores
2015-02-15 5:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores Cunming Liang
@ 2015-02-15 6:58 ` Qiu, Michael
2015-02-15 8:32 ` Liang, Cunming
2015-02-24 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Qiu, Michael @ 2015-02-15 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liang, Cunming, dev
Hi, Steve
Why not post this patch within your enabling EAL "--lcores" option patch
set?
As it is not merged yet.
Just a suggestion, depends you.
Thanks,
Michael
On 2/15/2015 1:48 PM, Cunming Liang wrote:
> The patch add unit test for the new eal option "--lcores".
>
> Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com>
> ---
> It depends on the previous patch which enabling EAL "--lcores" option.
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013204.html
>
> app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> index 0a8269c..0352f87 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> @@ -512,47 +512,114 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void)
>
> /* -c flag but no coremask value */
> const char *argv1[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c"};
> - /* No -c or -l flag at all */
> + /* No -c, -l or --lcores flag at all */
> const char *argv2[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3"};
> /* bad coremask value */
> - const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "error" };
> + const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "-c", "error" };
> /* sanity check of tests - valid coremask value */
> - const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "1" };
> + const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "-c", "1" };
> /* -l flag but no corelist value */
> - const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l"};
> - const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", " " };
> + const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "-l"};
> + const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "-l", " " };
> /* bad corelist values */
> - const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "error" };
> - const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" };
> - const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
> - const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
> + const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "-l", "error" };
> + const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" };
> + const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
> + const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
> /* sanity check test - valid corelist value */
> - const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
> + const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
> +
> + /* --lcores flag but no lcores value */
> + const char *argv12[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores" };
> + const char *argv13[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores", " " };
> + /* bad lcores value */
> + const char *argv14[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3-5" };
> + const char *argv15[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-1,,2" };
> + const char *argv16[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-,1" };
> + const char *argv17[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(0-,2-4)" };
> + const char *argv18[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(-1,2)" };
> + const char *argv19[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(2-4)@(2-4-6)" };
> + const char *argv20[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(a,2)" };
> + const char *argv21[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3@(1,3)" };
> + const char *argv22[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "3@((1,3)" };
> + const char *argv23[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(4-7)=(1,3)" };
> + const char *argv24[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "[4-7]@(1,3)" };
> + /* sanity check of tests - valid lcores value */
> + const char *argv25[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> + "-n", "3", "--lcores",
> + "0-1,2@(5-7),(3-5)@(0,2),(0,6),7"};
>
> if (launch_proc(argv1) == 0
> || launch_proc(argv2) == 0
> || launch_proc(argv3) == 0) {
> - printf("Error - process ran without error when missing -c flag\n");
> + printf("Error - "
> + "process ran without error when missing -c flag\n");
> return -1;
> }
> if (launch_proc(argv4) != 0) {
> - printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n");
> + printf("Error - "
> + "process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> + /* start -l test */
> if (launch_proc(argv5) == 0
> || launch_proc(argv6) == 0
> || launch_proc(argv7) == 0
> || launch_proc(argv8) == 0
> || launch_proc(argv9) == 0
> || launch_proc(argv10) == 0) {
> - printf("Error - process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
> + printf("Error - "
> + "process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
> return -1;
> }
> if (launch_proc(argv11) != 0) {
> - printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
> + printf("Error - "
> + "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
> return -1;
> }
> +
> + /* start --lcores tests */
> + if (launch_proc(argv12) == 0 || launch_proc(argv13) == 0 ||
> + launch_proc(argv14) == 0 || launch_proc(argv15) == 0 ||
> + launch_proc(argv16) == 0 || launch_proc(argv17) == 0 ||
> + launch_proc(argv18) == 0 || launch_proc(argv19) == 0 ||
> + launch_proc(argv20) == 0 || launch_proc(argv21) == 0 ||
> + launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || launch_proc(argv22) == 0 ||
> + launch_proc(argv23) == 0 || launch_proc(argv24) == 0) {
> + printf("Error - "
> + "process ran without error with invalid --lcore flag\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if (launch_proc(argv25) != 0) {
> + printf("Error - "
> + "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores
2015-02-15 6:58 ` Qiu, Michael
@ 2015-02-15 8:32 ` Liang, Cunming
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Liang, Cunming @ 2015-02-15 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qiu, Michael, dev
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qiu, Michael
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 2:59 PM
> To: Liang, Cunming; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores
>
> Hi, Steve
>
> Why not post this patch within your enabling EAL "--lcores" option patch
> set?
> As it is not merged yet.
>
[LCM] As that patch series already go through several round review, I won't expect to involve the totally new update on it.
> Just a suggestion, depends you.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
> On 2/15/2015 1:48 PM, Cunming Liang wrote:
> > The patch add unit test for the new eal option "--lcores".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > It depends on the previous patch which enabling EAL "--lcores" option.
> > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013204.html
> >
> > app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 95
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> > index 0a8269c..0352f87 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c
> > @@ -512,47 +512,114 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void)
> >
> > /* -c flag but no coremask value */
> > const char *argv1[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c"};
> > - /* No -c or -l flag at all */
> > + /* No -c, -l or --lcores flag at all */
> > const char *argv2[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3"};
> > /* bad coremask value */
> > - const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "error" };
> > + const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "-c", "error" };
> > /* sanity check of tests - valid coremask value */
> > - const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "1" };
> > + const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "-c", "1" };
> > /* -l flag but no corelist value */
> > - const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l"};
> > - const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", " " };
> > + const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "-l"};
> > + const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "-l", " " };
> > /* bad corelist values */
> > - const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "error" };
> > - const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" };
> > - const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
> > - const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
> > + const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "-l", "error" };
> > + const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" };
> > + const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "-l", "1," };
> > + const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" };
> > /* sanity check test - valid corelist value */
> > - const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
> > + const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" };
> > +
> > + /* --lcores flag but no lcores value */
> > + const char *argv12[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores" };
> > + const char *argv13[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", " " };
> > + /* bad lcores value */
> > + const char *argv14[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3-5" };
> > + const char *argv15[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-1,,2" };
> > + const char *argv16[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-,1" };
> > + const char *argv17[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(0-,2-4)" };
> > + const char *argv18[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(-1,2)" };
> > + const char *argv19[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(2-4)@(2-4-6)" };
> > + const char *argv20[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(a,2)" };
> > + const char *argv21[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3@(1,3)" };
> > + const char *argv22[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "3@((1,3)" };
> > + const char *argv23[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(4-7)=(1,3)" };
> > + const char *argv24[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "[4-7]@(1,3)" };
> > + /* sanity check of tests - valid lcores value */
> > + const char *argv25[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag,
> > + "-n", "3", "--lcores",
> > + "0-1,2@(5-7),(3-5)@(0,2),(0,6),7"};
> >
> > if (launch_proc(argv1) == 0
> > || launch_proc(argv2) == 0
> > || launch_proc(argv3) == 0) {
> > - printf("Error - process ran without error when missing -c flag\n");
> > + printf("Error - "
> > + "process ran without error when missing -c flag\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> > if (launch_proc(argv4) != 0) {
> > - printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid coremask
> value\n");
> > + printf("Error - "
> > + "process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > + /* start -l test */
> > if (launch_proc(argv5) == 0
> > || launch_proc(argv6) == 0
> > || launch_proc(argv7) == 0
> > || launch_proc(argv8) == 0
> > || launch_proc(argv9) == 0
> > || launch_proc(argv10) == 0) {
> > - printf("Error - process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
> > + printf("Error - "
> > + "process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> > if (launch_proc(argv11) != 0) {
> > - printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
> > + printf("Error - "
> > + "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> > +
> > + /* start --lcores tests */
> > + if (launch_proc(argv12) == 0 || launch_proc(argv13) == 0 ||
> > + launch_proc(argv14) == 0 || launch_proc(argv15) == 0 ||
> > + launch_proc(argv16) == 0 || launch_proc(argv17) == 0 ||
> > + launch_proc(argv18) == 0 || launch_proc(argv19) == 0 ||
> > + launch_proc(argv20) == 0 || launch_proc(argv21) == 0 ||
> > + launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || launch_proc(argv22) == 0 ||
> > + launch_proc(argv23) == 0 || launch_proc(argv24) == 0) {
> > + printf("Error - "
> > + "process ran without error with invalid --lcore flag\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (launch_proc(argv25) != 0) {
> > + printf("Error - "
> > + "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores
2015-02-15 5:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores Cunming Liang
2015-02-15 6:58 ` Qiu, Michael
@ 2015-02-24 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-02-24 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cunming Liang; +Cc: dev
2015-02-15 13:47, Cunming Liang:
> The patch add unit test for the new eal option "--lcores".
>
> Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com>
> ---
> It depends on the previous patch which enabling EAL "--lcores" option.
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013204.html
Applied, thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-24 19:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-15 5:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores Cunming Liang
2015-02-15 6:58 ` Qiu, Michael
2015-02-15 8:32 ` Liang, Cunming
2015-02-24 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).