* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores @ 2015-02-15 5:47 Cunming Liang 2015-02-15 6:58 ` Qiu, Michael 2015-02-24 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Cunming Liang @ 2015-02-15 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev The patch add unit test for the new eal option "--lcores". Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com> --- It depends on the previous patch which enabling EAL "--lcores" option. http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013204.html app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c index 0a8269c..0352f87 100644 --- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c +++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c @@ -512,47 +512,114 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void) /* -c flag but no coremask value */ const char *argv1[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c"}; - /* No -c or -l flag at all */ + /* No -c, -l or --lcores flag at all */ const char *argv2[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3"}; /* bad coremask value */ - const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "error" }; + const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "-c", "error" }; /* sanity check of tests - valid coremask value */ - const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "1" }; + const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "-c", "1" }; /* -l flag but no corelist value */ - const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l"}; - const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", " " }; + const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "-l"}; + const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "-l", " " }; /* bad corelist values */ - const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "error" }; - const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" }; - const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1," }; - const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" }; + const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "-l", "error" }; + const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" }; + const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "-l", "1," }; + const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" }; /* sanity check test - valid corelist value */ - const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" }; + const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" }; + + /* --lcores flag but no lcores value */ + const char *argv12[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores" }; + const char *argv13[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", " " }; + /* bad lcores value */ + const char *argv14[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3-5" }; + const char *argv15[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-1,,2" }; + const char *argv16[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-,1" }; + const char *argv17[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(0-,2-4)" }; + const char *argv18[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(-1,2)" }; + const char *argv19[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(2-4)@(2-4-6)" }; + const char *argv20[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(a,2)" }; + const char *argv21[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3@(1,3)" }; + const char *argv22[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "3@((1,3)" }; + const char *argv23[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(4-7)=(1,3)" }; + const char *argv24[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "[4-7]@(1,3)" }; + /* sanity check of tests - valid lcores value */ + const char *argv25[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, + "-n", "3", "--lcores", + "0-1,2@(5-7),(3-5)@(0,2),(0,6),7"}; if (launch_proc(argv1) == 0 || launch_proc(argv2) == 0 || launch_proc(argv3) == 0) { - printf("Error - process ran without error when missing -c flag\n"); + printf("Error - " + "process ran without error when missing -c flag\n"); return -1; } if (launch_proc(argv4) != 0) { - printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n"); + printf("Error - " + "process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n"); return -1; } + /* start -l test */ if (launch_proc(argv5) == 0 || launch_proc(argv6) == 0 || launch_proc(argv7) == 0 || launch_proc(argv8) == 0 || launch_proc(argv9) == 0 || launch_proc(argv10) == 0) { - printf("Error - process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n"); + printf("Error - " + "process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n"); return -1; } if (launch_proc(argv11) != 0) { - printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n"); + printf("Error - " + "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n"); return -1; } + + /* start --lcores tests */ + if (launch_proc(argv12) == 0 || launch_proc(argv13) == 0 || + launch_proc(argv14) == 0 || launch_proc(argv15) == 0 || + launch_proc(argv16) == 0 || launch_proc(argv17) == 0 || + launch_proc(argv18) == 0 || launch_proc(argv19) == 0 || + launch_proc(argv20) == 0 || launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || + launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || launch_proc(argv22) == 0 || + launch_proc(argv23) == 0 || launch_proc(argv24) == 0) { + printf("Error - " + "process ran without error with invalid --lcore flag\n"); + return -1; + } + + if (launch_proc(argv25) != 0) { + printf("Error - " + "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n"); + return -1; + } + return 0; } -- 1.8.1.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores 2015-02-15 5:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores Cunming Liang @ 2015-02-15 6:58 ` Qiu, Michael 2015-02-15 8:32 ` Liang, Cunming 2015-02-24 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Qiu, Michael @ 2015-02-15 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Liang, Cunming, dev Hi, Steve Why not post this patch within your enabling EAL "--lcores" option patch set? As it is not merged yet. Just a suggestion, depends you. Thanks, Michael On 2/15/2015 1:48 PM, Cunming Liang wrote: > The patch add unit test for the new eal option "--lcores". > > Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com> > --- > It depends on the previous patch which enabling EAL "--lcores" option. > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013204.html > > app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c > index 0a8269c..0352f87 100644 > --- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c > +++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c > @@ -512,47 +512,114 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void) > > /* -c flag but no coremask value */ > const char *argv1[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c"}; > - /* No -c or -l flag at all */ > + /* No -c, -l or --lcores flag at all */ > const char *argv2[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3"}; > /* bad coremask value */ > - const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "error" }; > + const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "-c", "error" }; > /* sanity check of tests - valid coremask value */ > - const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "1" }; > + const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "-c", "1" }; > /* -l flag but no corelist value */ > - const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l"}; > - const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", " " }; > + const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "-l"}; > + const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "-l", " " }; > /* bad corelist values */ > - const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "error" }; > - const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" }; > - const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1," }; > - const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" }; > + const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "-l", "error" }; > + const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" }; > + const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "-l", "1," }; > + const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" }; > /* sanity check test - valid corelist value */ > - const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" }; > + const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" }; > + > + /* --lcores flag but no lcores value */ > + const char *argv12[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores" }; > + const char *argv13[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", " " }; > + /* bad lcores value */ > + const char *argv14[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3-5" }; > + const char *argv15[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-1,,2" }; > + const char *argv16[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-,1" }; > + const char *argv17[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(0-,2-4)" }; > + const char *argv18[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(-1,2)" }; > + const char *argv19[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(2-4)@(2-4-6)" }; > + const char *argv20[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(a,2)" }; > + const char *argv21[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3@(1,3)" }; > + const char *argv22[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "3@((1,3)" }; > + const char *argv23[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(4-7)=(1,3)" }; > + const char *argv24[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "[4-7]@(1,3)" }; > + /* sanity check of tests - valid lcores value */ > + const char *argv25[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", > + "0-1,2@(5-7),(3-5)@(0,2),(0,6),7"}; > > if (launch_proc(argv1) == 0 > || launch_proc(argv2) == 0 > || launch_proc(argv3) == 0) { > - printf("Error - process ran without error when missing -c flag\n"); > + printf("Error - " > + "process ran without error when missing -c flag\n"); > return -1; > } > if (launch_proc(argv4) != 0) { > - printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n"); > + printf("Error - " > + "process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n"); > return -1; > } > > + /* start -l test */ > if (launch_proc(argv5) == 0 > || launch_proc(argv6) == 0 > || launch_proc(argv7) == 0 > || launch_proc(argv8) == 0 > || launch_proc(argv9) == 0 > || launch_proc(argv10) == 0) { > - printf("Error - process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n"); > + printf("Error - " > + "process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n"); > return -1; > } > if (launch_proc(argv11) != 0) { > - printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n"); > + printf("Error - " > + "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n"); > return -1; > } > + > + /* start --lcores tests */ > + if (launch_proc(argv12) == 0 || launch_proc(argv13) == 0 || > + launch_proc(argv14) == 0 || launch_proc(argv15) == 0 || > + launch_proc(argv16) == 0 || launch_proc(argv17) == 0 || > + launch_proc(argv18) == 0 || launch_proc(argv19) == 0 || > + launch_proc(argv20) == 0 || launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || > + launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || launch_proc(argv22) == 0 || > + launch_proc(argv23) == 0 || launch_proc(argv24) == 0) { > + printf("Error - " > + "process ran without error with invalid --lcore flag\n"); > + return -1; > + } > + > + if (launch_proc(argv25) != 0) { > + printf("Error - " > + "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n"); > + return -1; > + } > + > return 0; > } > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores 2015-02-15 6:58 ` Qiu, Michael @ 2015-02-15 8:32 ` Liang, Cunming 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Liang, Cunming @ 2015-02-15 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qiu, Michael, dev Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Qiu, Michael > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 2:59 PM > To: Liang, Cunming; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores > > Hi, Steve > > Why not post this patch within your enabling EAL "--lcores" option patch > set? > As it is not merged yet. > [LCM] As that patch series already go through several round review, I won't expect to involve the totally new update on it. > Just a suggestion, depends you. > > Thanks, > Michael > On 2/15/2015 1:48 PM, Cunming Liang wrote: > > The patch add unit test for the new eal option "--lcores". > > > > Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com> > > --- > > It depends on the previous patch which enabling EAL "--lcores" option. > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013204.html > > > > app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 95 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c > > index 0a8269c..0352f87 100644 > > --- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c > > +++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c > > @@ -512,47 +512,114 @@ test_missing_c_flag(void) > > > > /* -c flag but no coremask value */ > > const char *argv1[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c"}; > > - /* No -c or -l flag at all */ > > + /* No -c, -l or --lcores flag at all */ > > const char *argv2[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3"}; > > /* bad coremask value */ > > - const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "error" }; > > + const char *argv3[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "-c", "error" }; > > /* sanity check of tests - valid coremask value */ > > - const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-c", "1" }; > > + const char *argv4[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "-c", "1" }; > > /* -l flag but no corelist value */ > > - const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l"}; > > - const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", " " }; > > + const char *argv5[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "-l"}; > > + const char *argv6[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "-l", " " }; > > /* bad corelist values */ > > - const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "error" }; > > - const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" }; > > - const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1," }; > > - const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" }; > > + const char *argv7[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "-l", "error" }; > > + const char *argv8[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "-l", "1-" }; > > + const char *argv9[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "-l", "1," }; > > + const char *argv10[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "-l", "1#2" }; > > /* sanity check test - valid corelist value */ > > - const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" }; > > + const char *argv11[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "-l", "1-2,3" }; > > + > > + /* --lcores flag but no lcores value */ > > + const char *argv12[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores" }; > > + const char *argv13[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", " " }; > > + /* bad lcores value */ > > + const char *argv14[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3-5" }; > > + const char *argv15[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-1,,2" }; > > + const char *argv16[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "0-,1" }; > > + const char *argv17[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(0-,2-4)" }; > > + const char *argv18[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(-1,2)" }; > > + const char *argv19[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(2-4)@(2-4-6)" }; > > + const char *argv20[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(a,2)" }; > > + const char *argv21[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "1-3@(1,3)" }; > > + const char *argv22[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "3@((1,3)" }; > > + const char *argv23[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "(4-7)=(1,3)" }; > > + const char *argv24[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", "[4-7]@(1,3)" }; > > + /* sanity check of tests - valid lcores value */ > > + const char *argv25[] = { prgname, prefix, mp_flag, > > + "-n", "3", "--lcores", > > + "0-1,2@(5-7),(3-5)@(0,2),(0,6),7"}; > > > > if (launch_proc(argv1) == 0 > > || launch_proc(argv2) == 0 > > || launch_proc(argv3) == 0) { > > - printf("Error - process ran without error when missing -c flag\n"); > > + printf("Error - " > > + "process ran without error when missing -c flag\n"); > > return -1; > > } > > if (launch_proc(argv4) != 0) { > > - printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid coremask > value\n"); > > + printf("Error - " > > + "process did not run ok with valid coremask value\n"); > > return -1; > > } > > > > + /* start -l test */ > > if (launch_proc(argv5) == 0 > > || launch_proc(argv6) == 0 > > || launch_proc(argv7) == 0 > > || launch_proc(argv8) == 0 > > || launch_proc(argv9) == 0 > > || launch_proc(argv10) == 0) { > > - printf("Error - process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n"); > > + printf("Error - " > > + "process ran without error with invalid -l flag\n"); > > return -1; > > } > > if (launch_proc(argv11) != 0) { > > - printf("Error - process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n"); > > + printf("Error - " > > + "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n"); > > return -1; > > } > > + > > + /* start --lcores tests */ > > + if (launch_proc(argv12) == 0 || launch_proc(argv13) == 0 || > > + launch_proc(argv14) == 0 || launch_proc(argv15) == 0 || > > + launch_proc(argv16) == 0 || launch_proc(argv17) == 0 || > > + launch_proc(argv18) == 0 || launch_proc(argv19) == 0 || > > + launch_proc(argv20) == 0 || launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || > > + launch_proc(argv21) == 0 || launch_proc(argv22) == 0 || > > + launch_proc(argv23) == 0 || launch_proc(argv24) == 0) { > > + printf("Error - " > > + "process ran without error with invalid --lcore flag\n"); > > + return -1; > > + } > > + > > + if (launch_proc(argv25) != 0) { > > + printf("Error - " > > + "process did not run ok with valid corelist value\n"); > > + return -1; > > + } > > + > > return 0; > > } > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores 2015-02-15 5:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores Cunming Liang 2015-02-15 6:58 ` Qiu, Michael @ 2015-02-24 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-02-24 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cunming Liang; +Cc: dev 2015-02-15 13:47, Cunming Liang: > The patch add unit test for the new eal option "--lcores". > > Signed-off-by: Cunming Liang <cunming.liang@intel.com> > --- > It depends on the previous patch which enabling EAL "--lcores" option. > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-February/013204.html Applied, thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-24 19:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-02-15 5:47 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] test: add ut for eal flags --lcores Cunming Liang 2015-02-15 6:58 ` Qiu, Michael 2015-02-15 8:32 ` Liang, Cunming 2015-02-24 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).