From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EA3A0597; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 23:59:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810381EBAA; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 23:58:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8430D1EB84 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 23:58:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F045C01A7; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:58:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:58:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=91Pb/HK/e/V03AsCF/zd/KnbZ+YHMlFjywgpq/StteM=; b=Cyb9qbzifST8 paYgHVZ5yztdMHez30z6bi6G8llNgZU47vX28WbyIGYyGonFSBo4ZkSGLONEbF/d J97Q7EUsG/x5GkANbnH8nQRdjPw1X30CLvpXecYaJ9OIjwP7VFSJDYE1d8w1KSra B4oxtIZ3+rr3jYUkjHEvBh+Dy9YDHYk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=91Pb/HK/e/V03AsCF/zd/KnbZ+YHMlFjywgpq/Stt eM=; b=tvaqd1u1kcLueDC7wuXVYZPAoJqoz1l2phNNuvKFMeG+hV8BlQeDx0SA3 GFiKoHmYKvAD5TwuHTqLMlXJto1JPl31W4X0Kj7kQ80l5sR7OlvW6ac6Tfw+h6sO d6NqqatT9QcgG1y36kSWlCesgsf2RzG3/cU7wBwIvmsKI2WJ7vfyg3NnypK+n0hI CQjHy1QC0o+/eqFrvUme3wEBszyEqRioxDfWJagHYA2mcK4gImf65Vwtyj2XIyC+ wJLAjntk/WU23v4US45mSmZ5u/1AjIPTF7I/cSWaRmRq8QdEu34OxhwQ8ND6/5GX oK+1X8TYF6Ig9hMjuqp108SaucZkw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrfeekgddthecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9C601306005F; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:58:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, aconole@redhat.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 23:58:01 +0200 Message-ID: <5106847.qgXdJBQaxk@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200316170921.6020-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> References: <20200316170921.6020-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] ci: reduce examples built for static builds X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 16/03/2020 18:09, Bruce Richardson: > Static builds can take a lot of space, so reduce the number of examples > built when doing those static builds. > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson No objection after one month, it is a RFC but I see nothing to change. Applied, thanks