From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC6856A3; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:36:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Apr 2019 03:36:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,385,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="318203280" Received: from dhunt5-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.210.15]) ([10.237.210.15]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2019 03:31:52 -0700 To: Kevin Traynor , "Pattan, Reshma" , "dev@dpdk.org" Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" References: <20190410124910.24537-1-david.hunt@intel.com> <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F2A449608@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com> From: "Hunt, David" Message-ID: <51325962-658f-b542-0bed-5e7f5bb327ab@intel.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:31:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] examples/vm_power_manager: fix buffer overrun X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:36:55 -0000 Hi Kevin, On 23/4/2019 11:26 AM, Kevin Traynor wrote: > On 18/04/2019 16:14, Pattan, Reshma wrote: >>> Fixes: d26c18c93260 ("examples/vm_power: cpu frequency in host") >>> Coverity issue: 337660 >> Candidate for stable@dpdk.org? > There is no reply to this comment - re-asking as I will probably have > the same question in a few weeks :-) There was a v2 this morning and it had a --cc stable on it. :) Rgds, Dave. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A7DA05D3 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:36:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343BD1B4D6; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:36:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC6856A3; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:36:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Apr 2019 03:36:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,385,1549958400"; d="scan'208";a="318203280" Received: from dhunt5-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.210.15]) ([10.237.210.15]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2019 03:31:52 -0700 To: Kevin Traynor , "Pattan, Reshma" , "dev@dpdk.org" Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" References: <20190410124910.24537-1-david.hunt@intel.com> <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F2A449608@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com> From: "Hunt, David" Message-ID: <51325962-658f-b542-0bed-5e7f5bb327ab@intel.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:31:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] examples/vm_power_manager: fix buffer overrun X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Message-ID: <20190423103151.QqehcI5h3a2yY3hMWBgUNYTFY0T4RQZPnwZtJvia4uQ@z> Hi Kevin, On 23/4/2019 11:26 AM, Kevin Traynor wrote: > On 18/04/2019 16:14, Pattan, Reshma wrote: >>> Fixes: d26c18c93260 ("examples/vm_power: cpu frequency in host") >>> Coverity issue: 337660 >> Candidate for stable@dpdk.org? > There is no reply to this comment - re-asking as I will probably have > the same question in a few weeks :-) There was a v2 this morning and it had a --cc stable on it. :) Rgds, Dave.