From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721528E91 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:26:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmeg8 with SMTP id g8so11865687wme.0 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 06:26:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind_com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=bZ/7AZJRlIpxfDxSWpL/bZmX5BHSEXwk8NdYOu4kW+A=; b=Hk7WPeIn0NmsNCxM29smxpXyATzq6RjJMH5l0CbId5a1h35ggzwN2OXipEMPXkHOE0 eb+wXwZ0WUovggi7OFI3YzFs+HbLPTLwy5KeVxsxGu1IwXBWYq0njkj5IOkqxo5CZdQ8 k89gG6n26HyN0xfeT3fCeKgaon37NnOpHsa+HSs5IcCS4H6K14JniXByctZhmQpGIz06 D9wAmjK8z6/WYh4cUCiBzK3IIUzKcDKMeXQpcJk7c7OMF7Yxea3yXdDJxa7TSmaKqqtn bDTafy+huH5nP5OX2MWbbKALzWLUx9xMKXoaOnyfU2cpHTHoeBWphpwLma1sP/bGL4HT dxUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=bZ/7AZJRlIpxfDxSWpL/bZmX5BHSEXwk8NdYOu4kW+A=; b=m3zvkLWxakBszyYa8tpK9++ILmATKLCRs/noR1zzp38UfDuhSCzk8WSHrAPl3G7nhz JKTzDRsj+6+uPfkRdOzaKMpkhZKU9nKsvgpZ437gjowB6fFp8HhBxKLxq7Pmv2vDV6iK QOsO6wCkgGl7Nxve25SEhWOC6wIVuedrOi5bxiTjE8FFfs+pd93nMwtWkg45umVKutsd LyYv+vbIlZ8+AjgdGu4zF077QGvMUXR9BboB9A0pLCvcCRmlx3RRlxpTPdRTwO/6eX+K GzGbg196E+rWS6Jo2dBoDH8sxs1URaCGmzDAcGJ1LIM54cfFvGlXFFLDEm3bVPMooxX+ wiEw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk46Y8p60Q87OBlHIuBIi2NztV3xylfGtRrv2R9eGFlDSz0ijVystm92ZFiwdo26BpAcoRP X-Received: by 10.28.91.72 with SMTP id p69mr3564487wmb.49.1446211576288; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 06:26:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t126sm2899224wmd.23.2015.10.30.06.26.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 06:26:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" , Dave Neary Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:25:05 +0100 Message-ID: <5157985.jDBArynuku@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67449C7B@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA674488A2@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <56336C69.5000405@redhat.com> <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67449C7B@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Architecture Board Proposal X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 13:26:16 -0000 2015-10-30 13:23, O'Driscoll, Tim: > From: Dave Neary > > There was a general agreement in Dublin that DPDK related projects and > > applications could live in dpdk.org, but we didn't really touch on the > > process or requirements for adding new projects. I think it's > > appropriate for the architecture board to own those too. > > That makes sense. So maybe what we're converging on is the following: > - The scope of the Architecture Board covers all projects hosted on dpdk.org. > - The Architecture Board will approve new projects to be hosted on dpdk.org. > - If it's not clear whether a new piece of functionality resides within one of the existing projects on dpdk.org or needs a new project of its own, the Architecture Board will decide. > > Is that in line with your thoughts on this? Do we need a board to define the scope of this board? ;) The only reason I see to reject a project, would be to consider that the project is not related to DPDK enough. I think it will be an obvious decision. So it shouldn't be a high responsibility nor a high workload to add to this board. But clearly, the hosted projects (except DPDK itself) should not be impacted by the DPDK board.